Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Net neutrality rules restored by US agency, reversing Trump

Published 04/25/2024, 07:29 AM
Updated 04/25/2024, 01:32 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Signage is seen at the headquarters of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 29, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 on Thursday to reinstate landmark net neutrality rules and reassume regulatory oversight of broadband internet rescinded under former President Donald Trump.

The commission voted along party lines to finalize a proposal first advanced in October to reinstate open internet rules adopted in 2015 and re-establish the commission's broadband authority.

FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said the agency "believes every consumer deserves internet access that is fast, open, and fair."

"The last FCC threw this authority away and decided broadband needed no supervision," she said.

Net neutrality refers to the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.

The FCC said it was also using its new authority to order the U.S. units of China Telecom (NYSE:CHA), China Unicom (NYSE:CHU) and China Mobile (NYSE:CHL) to discontinue broadband internet access services in the United States.

Rosenworcel noted the FCC has taken similar actions against Chinese telecom companies in the past using existing authority.

Reinstating the net neutrality rules has been a priority for President Joe Biden, who signed a July 2021 executive order encouraging the FCC to reinstate net neutrality rules adopted under Democratic President Barack Obama.

Democrats were stymied for nearly three years because they did not take majority control of the five-member FCC until October.

Under Trump, the FCC had argued the net neutrality rules were unnecessary, blocked innovation and resulted in a decline in network investment by internet service providers, a contention disputed by Democrats.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce criticized the FCC action saying it was "imposing a flawed, pre-television era regulatory structure on broadband" and "will only deter the investments and innovation necessary to connect all Americans."

Public interest group Free Press said the vote is a "major victory for the public interest" saying it "empowers the FCC to hold companies like AT&T (NYSE:T), Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA), Spectrum and Verizon (NYSE:VZ) accountable for a wide range of harms to internet users across the United States."

A group of Republican lawmakers, including House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Senator Ted Cruz, called the plan "an illegal power grab that would expose the broadband industry to an oppressive regulatory regime" giving the agency and states power to impose rate regulation,

unbundle obligations and tax broadband internet providers.

Democrats on the FCC say they will not set rate regulations.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association, whose members include Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), back net neutrality, arguing the rules "must be reinstated to preserve open access to the internet".

USTelecom, whose members include AT&T, Verizon and others, called reinstating net neutrality "entirely counterproductive, unnecessary, and an anti-consumer regulatory distraction".

Despite the 2017 decision to withdraw the requirement at the federal level, a dozen states now have net neutrality laws or regulations in place. Industry groups abandoned legal challenges to those state requirements in May 2022.

Latest comments

Amazing “regardless of the source” now what do you think that means?
Means first-come-first-serve through the network, whether that bid of data came from a red state or a blue state, whether it came from CNN or from Alex Jones. It's pro-free speech.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.