Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

California officials reject subsidies for Musk's SpaceX over Tesla spat

Published 05/15/2020, 05:00 PM
Updated 05/16/2020, 12:35 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: SpaceX founder and chief engineer Elon Musk speaks at a post-launch news conference to discuss the  SpaceX Crew Dragon astronaut capsule in-flight abort test at the Kennedy Space Center

di Joey Roulette

(Reuters) - A California state panel on Friday rejected a request from Elon Musk's SpaceX for $655,500 in state job and training funds, citing the chief executive's recent threats to move Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), the electric carmaker that he also runs, out of the state.

The snub comes as Musk has sparred with officials in Alameda County over his plans to resume production at the Tesla plant there, which was stopped because of the coronavirus.

Five members of California's Employment Training Panel voted to reject the proposal and two voted for it, with one member absent, after discussing Musk's tweets on Tesla's reopening and media reports of layoffs at SpaceX's Hawthorne, California headquarters in recent years. 

"In my opinion, given the recent threats of the CEO to leave the state of California, and everything else we’ve discussed today, this proposal does not rise to the level for me to feel secure in supporting it," said Gretchen Newsom, a panel member and the political director of an IBEW electrical workers union local.

"SpaceX is a different company, but they have the same CEO," said Newsom, who is not related to California Governor Gavin Newsom.

Though a small amount of money, the funding was opposed by organized labor groups. Tesla and SpaceX are both nonunion shops.

The funding from the state employment development fund was supposed to help SpaceX train 900 employees for its Starlink satellite project and hire 300 to work on its Starship program. It was unclear whether SpaceX intends to move forward with its hiring plan after Friday's rejection. 

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Since the disagreement between Tesla and Alameda County gained national attention, officials from such states as Texas, Nevada, Georgia, Utah and Oklahoma have pitched Musk about considering their state for existing operations or for a new factory the company has promised.

Latest comments

Elon Musk is an unreliable spoiled brat who wants to live on Mars. And he wants you to pay for it.
Californians refuse being taked as hostage by any businesses in order for them to stay in the state.
Florida would love to pay more to get SpaceX.
665K is less than one million right? Wow California is so great!
The likelyhood of SpaceX being moved out of CA is low IMO. To launch rockets of that size requires a coastal location and if I'm not mistaken, which I might be, a certain latitude for proper launch angles and the sort (any rocket scientists out there that could back this up or tell me it's bunk?) Seems short sighted to reject 1200 jobs when 30 million Americans just got sacked. Personally ive never been a fan of Mr. Musk but I'm with him on this one.
Robert nobody can launch a rocket from Houston. Right?
When is this guy going to learn that California doesn't need him and No I don't live in California but California will not be bullied by corporate america...California already holds some of the wealthiest companies in the world Elon's just think his "TSLA" stock name is worth more than the actual #$$# that they are spewing out.
Very short sighted. The future benefit could be huge
Texas or Arizona would love to have you Elon!
You realize California made Musk and Tesla. Both Arizona and Texas wouldn't have given Musk anything for him to establish Tesla from the beginning.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.