U.S. government increases oversight of police-reform monitors
Reuters
Published Sep 13, 2021 11:32AM ET
Updated Sep 13, 2021 02:55PM ET
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department, in the midst of investigating policing practices in three major cities, will toughen oversight of federal monitors who supervise implementation of police reforms mandated in civil consent decrees, Attorney General Merrick Garland said on Monday.
The department's civil rights division is pursuing high-profile investigations into possible police abuses in Minneapolis https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-launch-probe-minneapolis-police-after-george-floyd-murder-report-2021-04-21, Louisville https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-launch-review-louisville-kentucky-police-abc-news-2021-04-26 and Phoenix https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-justice-department-launches-probe-into-policing-practices-arizona-2021-08-05. If the probes show that the those police departments engaged in patterns or practices of discrimination or use of excessive force, the government could seek a consent decree to enforce reforms.
Monitors oversee implementation of consent decrees approved by federal courts after being negotiated by municipalities and the Justice Department. They are intended to be neutral arbiters of compliance with a decree.
Garland told an event hosted by a police organization that while settlements with police departments have improved policing practices, it is "no secret" that monitorships also have caused frustrations.
"While consent decrees and monitorships are important tools to increase transparency and accountability, the department can and should do more to improve their efficiency and efficacy," Garland said in prepared remarks.
The new rules impose annual budget caps on monitors to prevent them from running up taxpayer costs for their services, bar monitors from "double-dipping" by serving on more than one monitoring team at a time, and require more training. They also limit the length of service of monitors and require an assessment of their performance to ensure their effectiveness.
Cities and other local jurisdictions also will be allowed after five years to ask a court to terminate a monitorship by demonstrating compliance with a decree's terms.
Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum policy group, lauded the new rules, noting that paying for a compliance monitor can cost big cities up to $100,000 monthly.
"The costs have been very high, and there is no incentive for them to end," Wexler said. "What the Justice Department did today really made history."
The steps were crafted after the department heard concerns from police departments, mayors and others about costs of monitor fees and questions about monitor accountability.
President Joe Biden has vowed to address what he has called U.S. systemic racism.
Get The News You Want
The department in April began its Minneapolis investigation after a white police officer was convicted of murdering a Black man named George Floyd in a 2020 incident that triggered racial justice protests in many U.S. cities. Five days later it opened its Louisville investigation after last year's fatal police shooting of a Black woman named Breonna Taylor in another incident that prompted demonstrations against police violence.
The department in August started investigating whether Phoenix police unlawfully used deadly force, retaliated against peaceful protesters and violated the rights of homeless people.
Written By: Reuters
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.