Warner Bros Discovery beats Ohio AG lawsuit over merger disclosures
Reuters
Published Feb 05, 2024 04:52PM ET
Updated Feb 05, 2024 05:46PM ET
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) -Warner Bros Discovery (NASDAQ:WBD) on Monday won the dismissal of a proposed class action led by Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, claiming it concealed negative financial information prior to the April 2022 merger of AT&T (NYSE:T)'s WarnerMedia and Discovery.
The attorney general said offering documents for the merger overstated how many streaming subscribers were paying for content including at HBO and HBO Max; concealed WarnerMedia's strategies for licensing content and distributing films; and hid the impending demise of the CNN+ streaming service.
Yost, on behalf of the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, said that as the truth came out, Warner Bros Discovery's stock price fell more than 40% over four months, wiping out nearly $25 billion of market value.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni in Manhattan, however, said the offering documents accurately explained how the company calculated streaming numbers, and that defendants including Chief Executive David Zaslav were not required to disclose various other information under federal securities laws.
She also said Yost failed to explain how the planned CNN+ cancellation rendered statements about Warner Bros Discovery's broader content strategy misleading.
Monday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the lawsuit cannot be brought again.
A lawyer representing Yost's office declined to comment.
Warner Bros Discovery's dozens of brands also include DC Comics, Food Network, Magnolia Network, TBS and TNT.
The law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges represented Warner Bros Discovery, Zaslav and some other defendants.
It called the decision a "complete victory," and said the challenged statements were "objectively true."
Warner Bros Discovery's stock price closed on Monday down 18 cents at $10.07, which is 58% below where it began trading on April 11, 2022.
The case is Ohio Public Employees Retirement System et al v Discovery Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-08171.
Get The News You Want
Written By: Reuters
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.