Judge may reject parts of Wells Fargo account abuse settlement
Reuters
Published May 17, 2017 10:45AM ET
Judge may reject parts of Wells Fargo account abuse settlement
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - A federal judge signaled that he may reject parts of Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) & Co's proposed $142 million settlement with customers for whom it opened millions of unauthorized accounts.
In an order on Tuesday evening, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco ordered lawyers for customers and the bank to address his concerns, including whether the entire settlement should be rejected, before a scheduled Thursday hearing to consider preliminary approval.
The accord would resolve claims that Wells Fargo employees opened as many as 3.5 million bogus accounts since 2002 to meet unrealistic sales goals, driving up costs for customers and often hurting their credit scores.
It followed a national scandal that erupted last September after the third-largest U.S. bank agreed to pay $185 million in penalties to settle related charges by various authorities.
Wells Fargo spokesman Jim Seitz on Wednesday said the San Francisco-based bank is preparing a response, and considers the settlement "an important step in our journey to make things right for our customers and rebuild trust."
Lawyers for the customers did not immediately respond on Wednesday to requests for comment.
Chhabria said he was "strongly inclined" to reject a provision for an injunction barring customers from pursuing other claims against the bank, and asked whether this would "require the court to reject the proposed settlement."
He also said he was "tentatively" inclined to carve out claims related to customer overdrafts, and said "there may be an argument" that executives and directors got too much protection.
Concerns were also raised that the settlement might not guarantee "full compensation" to everyone harmed, and might limit the potential for "significant" punitive damages.
The judge also asked how the estimate of bogus accounts rose to 3.5 million, a number suggested by the customers' lawyers last Thursday, from the prior 2.1 million estimate.
Chhabria has received several objections contending that the settlement is too broad, and the payout is too low.
The scandal cost former Wells Fargo Chief Executive John Stumpf and retail banking chief Carrie Tolstedt their jobs, plus tens of millions of dollars of compensation.
Get The News You Want
Written By: Reuters
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.