The regulatory and legal headwinds facing Robinhood
Reuters
Published Jul 01, 2021 08:24PM ET
Updated Jul 02, 2021 06:31AM ET
By Chris Prentice and Michelle Price
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Robinhood Markets Inc, the online brokerage at the center of this year's retail trading frenzy, disclosed on Thursday previously unreported regulatory risks in its long-awaited initial public offering filing.
Amid an increasingly hostile climate in Democrat-led Washington, Robinhood's growing regulatory attention could be a turn off for some potential investors.
Aside from fines, Robinhood noted that government probes could result in business restrictions, increased compliance controls, changes to products and services and brand damage.
The company, which boasts 18 million customers, had drawn regulatory penalties for system outages and misleading disclosures even before it sparked outcry by curbing trading in some shares at the height of January's "meme stock" saga. [L4N2K9478]
That episode sparked multiple probes and intensified scrutiny of Robinhood's business model.
To date, the startup has paid more than $136 million to settle regulators' allegations of wrongdoing, including a $70 million penalty announced by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on Wednesday. [L2N2OC1P1]
While those penalties are small by Wall Street standards, Robinhood's legal expenses are growing fast, jumping from $1.4 million in 2019 to $105 million last year, the filings show.
Here are some of the regulatory threats that Robinhood noted in connection to its IPO.
'MEME STOCK' PROBES
Robinhood said that regulators had issued subpoenas or sought testimony and information from the company and CEO Vladimir Tenev as part of investigations into trading restrictions the brokerage imposed during January's meme-stock volatility.
The regulators included the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), FINRA, the New York Attorney General's Office, other state attorneys general, Congress and some state securities regulators.
Perhaps the biggest revelation, though, was that authorities also took the unusual step of seizing Tenev's cell phone, Robinhood said, without elaborating.
OTHER INVESTIGATIONS, LEGAL RISKS
Robinhood also revealed what appeared to be a previously unreported probe by New York's Department of Financial Services (DYFS) focused on anti-money laundering and cybersecurity issues that the company expects to settle for around $15 million.
Additionally, in April, the California Attorney General's Office issued a subpoena seeking documents and information about Robinhood's trading platform, business and operations, and the application of California's commodities regulations to the platform. The company said it is co-operating with the probe.
Get The News You Want
Unrelated to the meme stock episode, the Massachusetts Securities Division (MSD) sued Robinhood in December alleging unethical and dishonest conduct and failure to act in accordance with its fiduciary duty among other lapses. Robinhood is fighting the suit.
The NYDFS, attorneys general for New York and California, and FINRA declined to comment. The SEC and MSD did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The company is also the target of more than 50 private lawsuits related to January's trading restrictions and other issues.
NEW REGULATIONS
Due to the meme stock saga, policymakers are scrutinizing practices core to Robinhood's business model, most notably payment-for-order-flow (PFOF), whereby brokers route retail orders to wholesale brokers in return for payment.
PFOF and other transaction rebates accounted for 75% of Robinhood's $959 million in 2020 revenues, Robinhood said.
SEC chair Gary Gensler has said PFOF raises conflict of interest and competition concerns, and he has asked staff to recommend new rules.
The agency is also examining "gamification," the use of game-like features to encourage trading, as well as other rules relating to liquidity and risk management.
New regulation in these areas could require "significant changes to our business model," Robinhood warned. Because its competitors are not as reliant on PFOF, heightened regulation of the practice "could have an outsize impact on our results," Robinhood said.
Written By: Reuters
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.