Didi Hit With U.S. Shareholder Suits After China Crackdown
Bloomberg
Published Jul 07, 2021 10:34AM ET
Updated Jul 07, 2021 11:36AM ET
Didi Hit With U.S. Shareholder Suits After China Crackdown
(Bloomberg) -- Didi Global Inc., its directors and underwriters were hit with two U.S. shareholder suits after a Chinese government crackdown sent the ride-hailing company’s shares plummeting shortly after its June 30 initial public offering.
The company, which lost about $15 billion of market value on Tuesday alone, had the second-largest U.S. IPO for a Chinese firm on record, raising $4.4 billion.
Securities class action law firms filed complaints in federal court in New York and Los Angeles late on Tuesday, saying the company failed to disclose ongoing talks it was having with Chinese authorities about its compliance with cybersecurity laws and regulations. The Chinese cybersecurity regulator announced on July 2 that it had begun an investigation of Didi and two days later ordered that the company’s app be removed from smartphone app stores.
The suits named Chief Executive Officer Will Wei Cheng, President Jean Qing Liu and several other executives and directors. Lead underwriters Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) were also named as defendants.
Didi didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Goldman, Morgan and JPMorgan also didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
China Risk Factors
Didi listed several risks factors associated with doing business with a Chinese firm subject to Chinese regulation in its IPO prospectus, but the suits said the company failed to highlight the ongoing talks it was having with regulators in Beijing.
“Rather than disclose the known discussions into the company’s practices and non-compliance with relevant technology laws, the registration statement vaguely discussed China’s regulatory regime with regards to data security,” shareholder Rafael Espinal said in the New York suit.
Chinese regulators asked Didi as early as three months ago to delay its landmark U.S. IPO because of cybersecurity concerns, according to people familiar with the matter. Shortly after launching its review of Didi, the Chinese government issued a sweeping warning to the country’s biggest tech companies, vowing to tighten oversight of both data security and overseas listings.
The corporate structure employed by Didi and other large Chinese companies that list in the U.S. could present a challenge to plaintiffs. U.S. shareholders can only own stakes in Chinese tech companies indirectly through offshore companies known as variable interest entities, which the Chinese government has suggested it will begin regulating more closely.
Read More: China Mulls Closing Loophole Tech Giants Use for U.S. IPOs
Didi warned IPO investors in its prospectus that their ability to protect their “rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.”
Get The News You Want
(Updates with attempts to reach defendants for comment, background)
©2021 Bloomberg L.P.
Written By: Bloomberg
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.