US state attorneys general clash over EPA emissions plan
Reuters
Published Jul 06, 2023 01:48PM ET
Updated Jul 06, 2023 07:11PM ET
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A group of 25 Republican state attorneys general on Thursday urged President Joe Biden's administration to abandon plans to sharply cut vehicle tailpipe emissions, while a group of Democratic counterparts from 20 states urged more stringent requirements.
The Environmental Protection Agency in April proposed new 2027-2032 vehicle standards that would be the most dramatic reductions in history. The EPA estimates that to meet the new standards, automakers would need to have 60% of new production be electric vehicles by 2030 and 67% by 2032.
The rules would cut emissions by 56% from existing 2026 requirements to speed the transition away from gasoline-powered engines to electric vehicles. EPA is expected to finalize the proposal by spring 2024.
The agency projects the rules would cut more than 9 billion tons of CO2 emissions through 2055, hoping to mitigate catastrophic climate change and save consumers billions in fuel costs. Republicans say it will have broad negative consequences such as higher consumer vehicle prices, limited choice and strain on the electrical grid.
Democratic attorneys general from New York, California, Pennsylvania, Illinois and other states said the EPA should go further. "Strong emissions standards are necessary now to stave off the worst impacts of human-induced climate change," they said, along with officials from six cities including the District of Columbia, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles.
The Republican attorneys general, led by Kentucky's Daniel Cameron and West Virginia's Patrick Morrisey said the EPA proposal was "unlawful and misguided" and "would damage our economy, tax our electrical grids and the families and businesses who depend on them, and threaten our national security."
Environmental and public health groups are pressing the administration not to weaken its proposal. The American Lung Association, American Medical Association and other health groups said the EPA should adopt more stringent standards to "protect regional air quality, address disparities in pollution burdens and reduce the health impacts of the climate crisis."
Many Republican state attorneys general have sued the EPA over its 2021 restoration of the Obama-era standards that were rolled back under Republican former President Donald Trump. Those lawsuits are pending.
Last week, the trade group representing nearly all major automakers said it wants EPA to soften its proposal to sharply cut vehicle emissions, saying it is "neither reasonable nor achievable."
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents General Motors (NYSE:GM), Volkswagen (ETR:VOWG_p), Toyota (7203.T), Hyundai and others, recommended "adopting requirements for 40 to 50% (electric, plug-in electric and fuel vehicles) in 2030 with continued increases through 2032."
Get The News You Want
The group called the proposal a "de facto battery electric vehicle mandate" and noted that EVs represented about 6% of new light-duty vehicles sales in 2022. The American Petroleum Institute this week called the plan "a de facto ban on vehicles using gasoline."
Mazda said separately that it was worried about the "exceptional stringency" of the rule, while Ford Motor (NYSE:F) said the EPA should "avoid setting criteria emissions requirements that will force unnecessarily large or ill-timed investments."
Written By: Reuters
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.