Coinbase Denies Involvement in the Colonial Pipeline Case
DailyCoin
Published Jun 14, 2021 08:00AM ET
Coinbase Denies Involvement in the Colonial Pipeline Case
- The US Department of Justice (DOJ) recouped $2.3 million of the $4.4 million paid in BTC in the Colonial Pipeline case.
- Law enforcement obtained the private keys of the Colonial Pipeline attackers DarkSide
Coinbase has dismissed all allegations in their involvement in providing the FBI with data from their servers.
- The capabilities of law enforcement and the FBI discourages a disadvantageous narrative for Bitcoin.
Ransomware attacks rely on demanding Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to prevent law enforcement from tracking the course of funds. The Colonial Pipeline hack on May 7th cost the company $4.4 million. The DOJ announced it recuperated $2.3 million from the Russian-based hacker group Darkside. Online allegations appeared as to how the FBI obtained the wallets’ private keys, pointing towards Coinbase as the central figure of the investigation.
Private Keys Are No Longer Private
FBI agents provided an affidavit stating the seizure warrant, in which 63.7 BTC has been redeemed from the attackers. The testimony that summarizes the warrant mechanics provides an explicit description of how funds have been tracked, listing several private keys of users’ wallets.
Government officials pointed towards a brute force hack to obtain private hacks. However, Preston Byrne argues that the user’s wallets were located on an exchange, for which officials issued a warrant. Philip Martin mentioned revendication of private keys was attributed to governmental “whiz-bang magic” or “good ol’ fashioned police work.”
Amid the speculation that Coinbase facilitated the FBI with access to their wallets, the CSO of Coinbase took to Twitter to debunk the considerations, stating, “Coinbase was not the target of the warrant and did not receive the ransom or any part of the ransom at any point.”
He further argued that “Coinbase uses a pooled hot wallet,” claiming there is no reason to hand over private keys as there is no API export function embedded into Coinbase.
On the Flipside
- Coinbase could have breached client data if an FBI warrant was issued to provide user data and private key information.
- Coinbase has faced previous criticism for delisting XRP or insider trading allegations.
- Market regulation represents positive news for Bitcoin as it affirms Bitcoin cannot hold ground in criminal activities.
- Data about how the DOJ obtained user’s private keys is blurry and not entirely clear.
FBI and Coinbase Secrets
The FBI has already proven it can use its resources to develop innovative ways of apprehending the illegal use of cryptocurrencies. As early as 2013, the FBI managed to shut down SilkRoad, arresting its founder, by exploiting vulnerabilities in the Bitcoin code.
Get The News You Want
According to a Vice report, operation “Trojan Shield” is a year-long-running operation. They facilitated a similarly safe communication means for criminals whilst it was under the control of the FBI. As a result, law enforcement could quickly obtain personal information and messages to use them to their advantage.
Over 20 million messages were obtained through the investigation; however, no connection was made between the ransomware seizure and the “Trojan Shield” experiment. Regardless of whether data was collected from FBI phishing or other means, the agent’s affidavit indicates the FBI used a block explorer to keep track of the ransomware funds through the block explorer.
Coinbase is Not User Friendly
The Coinbase allegation is somewhat well-founded, given the company’s previous history. A ThisIsBullish infographic indicates the connection between the Ransomware hack and Coinbase. They highlight the funds ran through the Coinbase California servers, and coincidently, the District Court of California obtained a series of private keys.
While Coinbase has refuted the allegations, their record of keeping a clean slate is doubtful. A class-action lawsuit has commenced against Coinbase for illicitly locking people out of their accounts for several months. As a result, defendants have lost a significant amount and are seeking $5 million in damages. To that end, the leading US cryptocurrency exchange is facing backlash despite the successful IPO from April 2021.
EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Join to get the flipside of crypto
Upgrade your inbox and get our DailyCoin editors’ picks 1x a week delivered straight to your inbox.
[contact-form-7] You can always unsubscribe with just 1 click.
Continue reading on DailyCoin
Written By: DailyCoin
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.