WSJ Economists' GDP Forecasts Versus The Fed
Doug Short | Mar 21, 2013 02:03AM ET
Now that Cyprus is on the back burner, at least for the time being, the big news yesterday was the publication of the FOMC minutes along with the Fed's three-year economic projections (2013-2015). Actually, these projections date from the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December 11-12, 2012. In other words, like a lot of government data, they're a bit stale by the time of publication. However, these are slow-moving data series, so time is not exactly of the essence.
Below is a snapshot of a table from the monthly survey of economists on a variety of economic metrics, including of course GDP. Fifty of the 52 economists solicited participated. Here is a look at the range of forecasts for Q1 2013 GDP. I've also highlighted the range of Fed forecasts. I've calculated the median (middle), mean (average) and mode (most frequent). Interestingly enough there were two modes for 2013 GDP on either side of the average.
Here is the same chart with the 2014 predictions and Fed range. Again we have two modes straddling the average, which, at 2.86%, is about half a percent higher than for 2013.
Ten fewer economists were willing to make forecasts as far out as 2015 (had I been solicited, I'd certainly have been one of the missing). Not surprisingly for this shot in the dark, the median, average and mode are an identical 3.0%.
But first things first. At the end of next month we'll get the advance estimate for Q1 2013 GDP. And before that we'll get the third estimate for Q4 2012 GDP, which came in at -0.1% and 0.1%, respectively, in the first two estimates. The Fed doesn't bother with forecasts of quarterly GDP, but the WSJ economists definitely see an improvement for Q1 of this year.
Hurricane Sandy is behind us, the Fiscal Cliff turned out to be a minor bump and sequestration hasn't torpedoed the economy (at least not yet). In the final chart above, the median and mode are both at 2.0%, and the average is a tad higher, which confirms what our eyes tell us -- that the economists are a bit skewed toward the upside in their expectations for the first quarter.
Get The News You Want
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.