World Markets Weekend Update: Another Shanghai Nosedive
Doug Short | Aug 02, 2015 12:26AM ET
Five of the eight indexes on our world watch finished in the green this week, although India's SENSEX was up only 0.01% and Japan's Nikkei 0.20%. The UK's FTSE 100 was the top performer with a 1.77% advance. This was the first top finish for the FTSE so far this year. The Shanghai was by far the worst performance, down an even 10% for the week.
Now for some market trivia: Which index has had the distinction of the most top weekly gains to date this year? The Shanghai Composite, of course, with 15 of the 31 closes (starting with Friday, January 2nd). And which index has the dubious distinction of the most last-place weekly closes? The Shanghai nudges out the SENSEX with eight last place weekly closes against the SENSEX's seven.
Here is an overlay of the eight for a sense of their comparative performance so far in 2015.
Here's an updated look at the Shanghai Composite over the past nine years. Below is a log-scale weekly chart illustrating the bubble that peaked in 2007 and the rally that started last year. The plunge from the 2015 peak was astonishingly swift and severe. The rally over the previous two weeks week had boosted hopes that the worst was over. But this week's 10% nosedive certainly disappointed the optimists.
Above, a table of the 2015 data performance, sorted from high to low, along with the interim highs for the eight indexes. All eight indexes are in the green, with France's CAC 40 at the top.
h3 A Closer Look at the Last Four Weeks/h3The tables below provide a concise overview of performance comparisons over the past four weeks (through year's end) for these eight major indexes. We've also included the average for each week so that we can evaluate the performance of a specific index relative to the overall mean and better understand weekly volatility. The colors for each index name help us visualize the comparative performance over time.
Get The News You Want
The chart below illustrates the comparative performance of World Markets since March 9, 2009. The start date is arbitrary: The S&P 500, CAC 40 and BSE SENSEX hit their lows on March 9th, the Nikkei 225 on March 10th, the DAX on March 6th, the FTSE on March 3rd, the Shanghai Composite on November 4, 2008, and the Hang Seng even earlier on October 27, 2008. However, by aligning on the same day and measuring the percent change, we get a better sense of the relative performance than if we align the lows.
h3 A Longer Look Back/h3
Here is the same chart starting from the turn of 21st century. The relative over-performance of the emerging markets (Shanghai, Mumbai SENSEX and Hang Seng) up to their 2007 peaks is evident, and the SENSEX remains by far the top performer. The Shanghai, in contrast, formed a perfect Eiffel Tower from late 2006 to late 2009.
Check back next week for a new update.
Note: We track Germany's DAXK a price-only index, instead of the more familiar DAX index (which includes dividends), for consistency with the other indexes, which do not include dividends.
All the indexes are calculated in their local currencies.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.