Don't Be Fooled, The EU Won't Escape Brexit Unscathed

 | Nov 16, 2017 05:01AM ET

by Jason Martin

If you’ve been following the soap opera that Brexit negotiations have become, one gets the impression that, though the UK's June 23, 2016 decision to split from the 28-member bloc known as the European Union seems to have placed Great Britain in some economic jeopardy, the remaining 27 EU members have little to lose from the divorce proceedings. It would appear that, whatever the consequences on the UK side, the countries remaining in the union will continue—as a group—to be a regional political and economic powerhouse.

However, though the immediate consequences have been felt in the British economy as discussed in our prior analysis earlier this week, the media appears to largely have examined the issue purely from the UK-side, generally neglecting to address any negative effects on the countries remaining in the EU.

Initially the EU was included in headlines, as individuals on both sides of the Channel worried over how their citizens residing in the other half of the soon-to-be-broken relationship would fare if they lost their current right to freedom of movement.

As both parties made clear their intent to maintain the status quo for foreign residents already established in their domain, the costs to the EU resulting from the UK’s planned departure appeared to fade from view and focus shifted to Britain’s need to pay financial obligations, the effect on its economy as future trade agreements remained in limbo, even as the pound slid, spurring inflation and forcing the Bank of England to hike rates at its most recent monetary policy meeting.

Having already examined whether the window is closing on the UK’s chances to get a good deal in our previous analysis, we'll now focus on the impact for the EU.

h2 Fact: the EU Will Take an Economic Hit/h2

When reading through pieces about Brexit, it’s key to remember that any future deals function as a two-way street. The costs to one side will be reflected on the other side, albeit to a larger or lesser degree.

In the worst case scenario, known as a “hard Brexit”, where the two sides fail to come to an agreement on trade, World Trade Organization rules would be applied to products sent from the UK to the EU and vice versa. Many industrial products would suddenly see tariffs added of just 2% to 3%, but cars would see a 10% tax tacked on, while many agricultural products would have a tariff of between 20% and 40%.

In fact, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned in its latest regional economic outlook that a “disruptive” Brexit would likely have a damaging impact on both parties.

"Under such circumstances, our concern is that economic growth will suffer, especially in the UK, but also the euro area," the IMF said (emphasis is ours).

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

Much like the IMF, most analysts expect the British economy to be harder hit than that of the remaining 27-members. In a recent report from Oxford Economics, their analysts projected that the impact on the UK economy would be 10 times larger than that of the EU. However, the underlying point remains that damage will indeed be felt by those being left behind.

According to the report, a breakdown in negotiations leading to no deal would result in a 3.1% rise in the cost of importing goods from the EU, but the bloc would also pay 3.5% more for UK exports. And while for the UK this will apply to roughly 60% of its exported and imported goods, the impact for all EU countries except Ireland, although much less, would still be nearly 10%.