Why Volatility Suggests Further Equity Weakness May Be In Store

 | Apr 24, 2020 01:16PM ET

There’s been a tremendous amount of discussion among traders and market commentators about the classification of the current trend in equities. Specifically, whether we are in a counter-trend rally (a dead cat bounce) or in the early stages of a new up trend after the March low. As I often do, I turn to volatility to get insight into what’s developing in the financial markets.

Last Sunday I wrote that I believed we were/are in a counter-trend rally within a longer-term bear market. Part of my reason for this is based on the lack of decline in volatility. This will cause many to stop and shout, “But the VIX has fallen from 83 to under 40!” And you’d be right. But I think we must evaluate the path volatility has taken from the viewpoint of its one-year percentile, i.e. where is it within its one-year range. Specifically – has its current decline been similar to prior bear market bottoms or counter-trend rallies?

I last wrote about a persistently elevated VIX on March 5 , noting that when we see VIX stay at an above-average level, historically we don’t see an immediate bounce in stocks – but instead experience further downside in price. During severe and protracted declines and bear markets, we historically see the VIX stay above roughly the 30 percentile of its one-year range. I’ll be taking a look at last two major bear markets as examples as well as the decline in late-2018.

Let’s start with the bear market that resulted from the dot-com bubble. Things didn’t start really moving until late 2001 when we dropped 20% within three months, a similar (albeit not as fast) decline as we have seen today. The VIX fell below its 30-percentile in November and the S&P 500 basically flatlined for seven months. Then, equities started moving materially lower and volatility started rising again. During the next bounce in stocks, what we now know as a ‘dead cat bounce’ in mid-2002, VIX never got to its 30percentile. Instead, volatility stayed elevated, which stocks then responded to by making a new low, eventually bottoming out.