Why Did The GDXJ ETF Rally?

 | Sep 09, 2022 01:20AM ET

There was some growth seen in gold and mining stocks that could make investors feel optimistic. Does this upward move change anything in the medium-term bearish perspective, though?

The precious metals sector moved higher yesterday, so you might be wondering if anything changed, and if so, what would that be.

In short, practically nothing changed. The only thing that really changed is that the probability of seeing a bigger rebound from ~$27 in the VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSE:GDXJ) decreased because of yesterday’s rally and last few days’ correction in general.

h2 Why would that be?/h2

Because markets correct when they get ahead of themselves in a given move. They rally or (like in this case) decline too far too fast. When they do, the force that has been pushing them in a given direction is temporarily gone, while the other side of the market gets the upper hand.

Then the test comes. Were these “new” price levels accidental? Or is this a new reality? Depending on that, people will either wait it out or act – buy or sell. The test can take place in all sorts of ways. The most obvious one is simply “time”. After a price moves below some key levels and remains there for an extended period of time, becomes obvious that the move was not an accident and that prices are actually staying there – perhaps for good and perhaps simply for much longer than just a few days.

Another way for markets to check if something is temporary or if it’s here to stay is through the verification of moves above or below certain levels. If these corrective moves bounce from the previous support and it proves to now be a resistance, it becomes clear that “things have changed.”

Why are markets measuring this at all? Because ultimately, whether something is expensive or cheap depends on what one compares it to. Context is king, right?

This can be discussed on many levels, but to simplify, one way to answer this question is to check if it’s above or below certain thresholds – support / resistance levels like Fibonacci retracements, previous highs/lows, moving averages. Indicators are also useful here.

However, the key thing is that if one stops viewing gold as “being at the bottom of a trading channel” and starts viewing it as “being after a breakdown below the previous lows,” the perspective changes. In the first case, gold seems like a good buy as it’s cheap relative to the trading channel, while in the second one, gold seems expensive as who knows how low it could fall if the previous lows just failed to hold.

Why am I writing all this? To explain why the recent price action actually made it less likely for PMs to rebound after an additional short-term decline (with GDXJ at about $27).

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

Since gold, silver, and mining stocks are correcting right now, it means that the verification – the shift in perception of the current price levels – is already taking place. Thus, if the markets “accept” the current levels as the new base, a move to “just” $1,680 in gold or $27 in the GDXJ might not be extreme enough to trigger a visible rebound.

This means that the markets could move much lower without a more visible pause in the meantime. This would imply at least a $100 decline in gold and a possible slide to the 2020 lows in mining stocks in the absence of a more visible correction in the meantime.

For now, let’s take a look at the shape of the most recent upswing in the GDXJ.