We're Fragmenting Because Our Experience Of The Economy Is Fragmenting
Charles Hugh Smith | Jul 05, 2017 05:58AM ET
The technocrat and capital-owning class is delighted with the economy, and can't understand why everyone isn't prospering.
You've probably seen some version of this chart of average household income in America before. (You may have seen charts of median household income as well; here's an article on the difference between the two methods of measurement: American families are learning the difference between median and mean )
Here's the data in table format, if you prefer: Household Income Quintiles .
The point is that there is an enormous difference between the average household incomes of the bottom 80% and the top 10%, 5% and 1%. It's important to separate the various income brackets, as including the top households distorts the average. Here we see the average household income of the bottom 80% of households is around $50,000, while the average income of the top 10% (which includes the wealthy 1% and the super-wealthy .1%) is almost four times greater: $185,000.
You've probably seen a version of this chart, too, which shows that the real (inflation adjusted) income of the bottom 90% has gone nowhere for the past 40+ years.
While the mainstream wrings its hands over the political and social fragmentation that is visible everywhere, it ignores the economic fragmentation that's the source: we're fragmenting because our experience of our economy and society is fragmenting.
In the good old days of secular growth of everything--energy consumption, wages, profits, employment, government spending, consumer debt, housing construction, business investment and consumer spending--people in every economic class shared a common experience that the financial future of their household was improving.
The economic pie was expanding, and everyone's slice was getting bigger--some more than others, of course, but there was enough trickling down to expand almost everyone's share of the economy.
That is no longer true. Those in the top 5% live in an entirely different economy than the bottom 80%. If we combine the higher incomes with the rising wealth of the top slice of households, we get an even starker picture of fragmentation.
Get The News You Want
Those in the bottom 50% live in a different economy than those between 80% and 90%--households that are holding their own--and those in the top 10% that are seeing their income and wealth advance.
The top 5% and above live in a different economy than those between 80% and 95%, as they are seeing their wealth and income rise sharply, even spectacularly if they own the "right" assets and income streams.
Those with gold-plated healthcare insurance live in a completely different world than those with huge deductibles. Those on Medicaid live in a more secure world than those with marginal private-sector coverage.
Households with two secure incomes have a completely different experience of the economy than those with insecure incomes that fluctuate from year to year.
Those who own their homes free and clear have a different reality from those struggling to pay massive mortgages and property taxes.
Those enjoying ample pensions from their federal, state and county/city employment live in a different world than those scraping by on Social Security.
We live in an economy of haves and have-nots, and the ladder between those earning $2,000 a month and those earning $20,000 a month has very few rungs. The pie is shrinking for the vast majority of households, nibbled away by inflation (supposedly near-zero), higher deductibles, fees, taxes, fines, interest and on and on.
The technocrat and capital-owning class is delighted with the economy, and can't understand why everyone isn't prospering. Their experience of the economy is that's it's pretty darn amazing and wonderful.
This class dominates the state, the corporate media, the philanthro-capitalist non-profit sector, and the think-tank and academic sectors (I'm not rich, look at the dust on my BMW, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), etc.). As a result, their cluelessness is the dominant narrative.
Our experience of the economy and of social/financial mobility has fragmented, and social and political fragmentation are the inevitable consequence.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.