US Bond Market Week In Review: Everyone's A Hawk, Edition

 | May 29, 2016 09:01AM ET

Several Fed Presidents gave presentations this past week. All argued the U.S. economy was not only at or near full employment but also that prices were rising and would eventually attain the Fed’s 2% price target. This implied that a rate hike within the next few meetings was a foregone conclusion.

The 5% unemployment rate was sufficient reason for San Francisco President Williams to argue the economy attained full employment. Williams’ primary inflation concern was how to avoid overshooting the Fed’s 2% price target:

I wouldn’t want us to purposefully overshoot inflation—the 2 percent goal by a lot and for an extended period, and here’s why. If we overshoot inflation, inflation moved to 2 ½ or 3 percent, say, well, then we would have to bring inflation back down and we would have to tighten policy and slow the economy a lot. So I think that there are some risks. There are always risks to overshooting your target and risks to, you know, having to undo that. So, you know, my, you know, kind of perfect landing for the economy would really have inflation moving, you know, basically back to 2 percent. And then from that point, you know, it sometimes would be a little above, sometimes a little bit below, but averaging 2 (percent).

President Bullard relied on a broader range of statistics, citing:

  1. Job openings per available worker are at a cyclical low.
  2. Unemployment insurance claims relative to the size of the labor force are at a multi-decade low.
  3. Nonfarm payroll employment growth has been well above longer-run trends.
  4. The level of a labor market conditions index, which aggregates many measures of labor market performance into a single index, is well above historical averages.

As with his employment position, Bullard relied on a broad spectrum of inflation data to argue prices were nearing the Fed’s 2% target: