Torturing the Data: Mid-Term Elections Implications
James Picerno | Nov 15, 2022 09:10AM ET
It’s been tempting in recent weeks to look at the stock market’s performance following US mid-term elections as biased upward for reasons linked to a special factor that prevails after voting. This is probably narrative mining than robust quantitative analysis.
The stock market does, in fact, show an upward bias in the 12-month periods following mid-term elections. The problem is that there are only a handful of mid-term elections in the historical record vs. thousands of 12-month-return windows, which are in fact upward biased. Teasing out why the former are a special subset from the latter due to mid-term elections isn’t obvious, but it makes for great headlines.
Consider how all the S&P 500’s one-year returns stack up since 1952. Clearly, there’s a strong positive skew. The average performance for 18,000-plus one-year returns is +9.1%. Roughly 74% of the one-year results are positive, which means that randomly choosing a handful of data points will likely show gains. Are mid-term election dates something special as start dates for analyzing one-year returns? Maybe, but it’s going to take more than a simple profile of return histories to make that case.
But let’s not be too critical of the stories in recent weeks that suggested there’s some unique force that tends to lift markets following mid-term elections. In a rough year for markets it’s understandable that investors are in need of a timely bullish narrative. But there’s always one waiting in the wings if your time horizon is the next 12 months.
The stock market’s general bias to rise can be attributed to many things, but it’s not obvious that mid-term elections are a critical, much less the only factor. To posit otherwise requires a degree of qualitative and/or multi-factor quantitative analysis that’s been lacking in the profiles making the rounds lately.
The point here is that it’s all too easy to assume that the stock market rises or falls because of one factor – mid-term elections in this case. Finding deep support in the data is something else entirely.
Get The News You Want
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.