Tobacco Stocks Too Expensive To Provide Safety

 | Jul 13, 2015 01:23AM ET

So much for the summer doldrums…

The Chinese stock market has crashed. Greece’s ongoing crisis has once again roiled European markets. Puerto Rico is on the verge of default. And Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner are getting divorced.

Naturally, investors are seeking safety, and the Pavlovian response to market volatility is to buy “defensive” stocks.

Owing to their relatively high dividend yields and non-cyclical businesses, tobacco stocks do fit the bill. Over time, investors have been conditioned to expect a relatively high degree of protection in tobacco industry stocks.

For my purposes, I’ll reference the S&P 500 Tobacco Composite, a market capitalization-weighted index of the following large-cap tobacco stocks: Altria Group (NYSE:MO), Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM), and Reynolds American (NYSE:RAI). Lorillard, Inc. (NYSE:LO) was also included prior to June 2015, when the company was acquired by Reynolds American.

Let’s take a look at the performance of the Tobacco Composite during sizable broader market declines in recent history. As a result of the credit crisis, the S&P 500 experienced a traumatic peak-to-trough decline of 57.7%. Yet, from its high in 2007 to its low in 2009, the Tobacco Composite only fell 39.9%. In other words, cigarette makers had a 31% smaller drawdown.

In 2011, the S&P 500 suffered a drawdown of 21.6%. The Tobacco Composite only declined 12.4%, representing a 42.6% smaller drawdown.

Comparatively, the “sin stocks” held up rather well during both of these episodes. However, here’s the catch… they’ve now become very expensive.