This Year’s Hottest Health Care ETFs
David Fabian | Jul 24, 2014 03:33AM ET
As a sector, health care has a lot to offer in terms of fundamental and technical data that supports ongoing innovation and profitability. The aging baby boomer population combined with an increased focus on adorable health insurance is continuing to promote a focus on new drugs and medical devices aimed to increase quality of life.
From a performance standpoint, the Health Care Select Sector SPDR (ARCA:XLV) has significantly and consistently beaten the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (ARCA:SPY) over multiple time frames. The following table illustrates the differences in average annual return of both funds over the last 1, 3, and 5-years.
The current list of health care-related ETFs (excluding leverage) now stands at 25. While XLV works well as a large-cap benchmark for the health care sector, there are a number of ETFs that track a more sophisticated group of companies. These can includes: industry groups, small companies, fundamental indexes, international stocks, and a host of other categories.
Often times these unique ETFs can produce much superior returns when compared to a plain-vanilla index. Being in the right spot at the right time, such as iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology ETF (NASDAQ:IBB) return of 65.51% in 2013, can lead to a tremendous advantage in your portfolio.
The following funds represent areas that have had the strongest performance of the health care group in 2014. Some of which you may never have heard of before.
Pharmaceuticals
The Market Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (NYSE:PPH) is the best performing health care industry ETF with a total return of 18.29% this year. This fund invests in the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-listed pharmaceutical companies based on market cap and trading volume. PPH charges a net expense ratio of 0.35% and has a 30-day SEC yield of 1.84%.
While 58% of the holdings in PPH are U.S.-based, a healthy exposure to stocks in Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and France has helped propel it past its peers this year. Investors in this ETF have benefitted from large jumps in Allergan (AGN) and Novo Nordisk (NVO), which have gained 53% and 26% respectively.
The continued development and distribution of new drugs makes the pharmaceutical industry a bright spot in the health care industry for the foreseeable future.
Get The News You Want
Biotechnology
While biotechnology stocks have cooled off significantly from their run last year, one ETF has continued to put up impressive results. The First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund (NYSE:FBT) has over $1.2 billion invested in just 20 biotechnology companies with an equal-weighted portfolio structure.
This concentrated basket of stocks allows for each holding to contribute a proportionate share of the total performance, which has combined to generate positive returns of 17.71% this year. The stocks in FBT are rebalanced on a quarterly basis to ensure the weightings remain in line with the index specifications and the fund charges an expense ratio of 0.60%.
This focused exposure can also work against the concept of diversification that ETFs have become so famous for as well. An ETF with fewer holdings can be subject to additional volatility if one stock fails to perform with the group. However, for the time being the FBT portfolio appears to be firing on all cylinders.
Healthcare Providers
The iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) is another leading segment of the healthcare sector this year as well. IHF has gained 13.57% so far in 2014 and just recently hit a new all-time high. This ETF tracks 49 stocks engaged in health insurance, diagnostics, and specialized treatment.
Companies in IHF such as UnitedHealth Group (UNH) and Wellpoint Inc (WLP) have continued to benefit from the halo effect of Obamacare along with a growing need for medical services here in the United States. IHF charges a modest 0.43% expense ratio and has over $500 million in total assets.
Historically, this fund has had less volatility than the market as a whole. According to the iShares website, IHF has a beta to the S&P 500 Index of just 0.65, which indicates smaller price fluctuations than a broad measure of stocks.
The Bottom Line
When you are researching which sector or ETF to purchase, make sure you pay close attention to the construction of the underlying index. That will have a significant impact on the performance of the fund through good times and bad. You should also note the expense ratio of the fund, as many ETFs have complementary portfolios with vast differences in annual fees.
In addition, it pays to know where the aggressive and conservative areas of each sector lie. In the case of healthcare, biotechnology is going to be characterized as a high beta industry, while healthcare providers will generally be lower in overall volatility.
Disclosure : FMD Capital Management, its executives, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds or any investment asset mentioned in this article. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities.
Original post
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.