This Is What ‘Fiscal Dominance’ Looks Like
Jesse Felder | Aug 13, 2020 12:42AM ET
Back in October, I published a post titled, “This Is What Monetization of the Debt Looks Like ,” arguing that the Fed’s intervention in the repo market at the time was not a return to “quantitative easing,” as many critics suggested at the time, but simply the central bank acting as lender of last resort to the Federal Government. It was, in its purest form, a commitment to monetize that amount of debt that could not be absorbed by the market.
Now, nearly 10 months later, it appears that this commitment has only grown stronger. What it really amounts to is “fiscal dominance,” a scenario in which a country’s debt grows so large that the central bank is forced to abandon whatever ostensible mandate it has been given for a new, unspoken one: print as much money as is required to fund the government and prevent a debt spiral.
It only takes a glance at the chart below to understand that the Fed is now being forced to play “follow the leader.” As former chief economist for the BIS William White put it:
“At some point, people realise that the government can’t support the debt burden without going back to the central bank to print more money. This is a tipping point.”
We have now reached that tipping point.
Investors should understand that this is a marked change from the monetary policy of the past in which the Fed could pursue its dual mandate without being hindered by fiscal policy. Fiscal policy is now officially taking the wheel and the dual mandate is taking a back seat. And if inflation does, indeed, make a comeback then the central bank’s ability to manage it could be severely hobbled by this new mandate to monetize the debt to whatever extent is necessary.
Perhaps this is why Pee Wee Herman voice), “I meant do that.” Because the perception that the Fed has explicitly engineered inflation may prove to be its only hope at preventing hyperinflation.
At some point, though, it will become obvious to all that the Fed abandoned its mandate of stable prices, not because it believed it was the right thing for the economy but because the federal government rewrote the mandate for them, even if it wasn’t done explicitly.
Get The News You Want
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.