The World According To ZIRP (And Why You Should Own Gold)

 | Oct 28, 2014 01:03AM ET

Down the rabbit hole we fell.

As if the labyrinth and tentacles of the financial crisis wasn't already hard enough to handle, we suddenly found ourselves waist deep in lifeboats - navigating those treacherous seas, from well beyond the comforts of the visible horizon. With almost six years of floating now between us and that long December, the curvature in the markets - so relied on in navigating previous cycles, is more than difficult to discern these days.

The world is as flat as ZIRP.

What this has meant in the markets, is participants continue to have a tough time finding their bearings when it comes to what the Fed will do next and where they are situated in the cycle. The expectation gap we noted over the past month is a direct effect of these esoteric market conditions that began with ZIRP - and which only were heightened as the Fed first pivoted to end quantitative easing in May 2013.

With the Fed on deck this week wrapping up what we expect will be the final disposition of the taper, participants continue to speculate where and when the next policy move will be made. "Yes, but when will they tighten?", they ask.

To a large degree - they already have. While the Fed Funds Rate has not moved higher since finding ZIRP, the differentials in yields have already compensated from beyond the mystical plane and in effect tightened over the past two years. It began with the first mention of the taper in the spring of 2013 and should be completed with the final crumbs of QE3 dispensed this month.

As shown below, with the relative performance between U.S. 5-Year and 10-Year yields, a massive move higher has discretely taken place over the past two years - despite the Fed Funds Rate remaining pegged at ZIRP. We chose to highlight and contrast the relative performance between 5 and 10-year yields, as the shorter duration markets have been disproportionally influenced by ZIRP and offer relatively no comparative value in our opinion. I.e. - the fallacy found today in waiting for an inverted yield curve to signal that a bear market approaches in the equity markets - or that a recession is near.

With that said, naturally, yields along the shorter end of the market tend to either "outperform" or "underperform" longer term yields as the Fed moves between tightening or easing monetary policy. When the Fed tightens, shorter term yields outperform - and vice versa, as they ease. Historically speaking, the long-term relative performance range between 5 and 10-year yields was maintained until 2002 - and closely correlated with the disposition trend of the Fed Funds Rate.