The Right And Wrong Way To Analyze Earnings

 | Sep 19, 2015 11:45PM ET

Now that the excitement over the FOMC decision is out of the way, I wanted to write about a pet peeve of mine - the analysis of EPS estimates and their expectations. Here are some of the analytical errors that I am seeing:h3 Expected EPS vs. reported EPS/h3

The WSJ warned that "The U.S. Appears Headed for an Earnings Recession", noting:

The second-quarter earnings season ended Friday with the SP 500’s profits contracting for the first time since the third quarter of 2012, according to FactSet. With expectations of a 4.4% decline in third-quarter earnings, the large-cap S&P index is poised for its first earnings recession in six years.

A recession, in most forms, is classified as two straight quarters of negative growth. While that hasn’t happened for earnings since the financial crisis, low oil prices, an elevated U.S. dollar and sluggish global growth have all weighed on profits this year. Not even a flurry of buybacks was enough to push profits into positive territory in the second quarter.

Falling corporate earnings are descending upon markets as volatility has ramped up amid concerns about growth overseas, namely in China. Perhaps more problematic, negative profit growth also comes as the Federal Reserve prepares to slowly remove its proverbial punch bowl from the mix, leading to less support from two previous sources of strength during the current bull market.

We all know that the stock market is inherently forward looking. This chart from John Butters of Factset shows the relationship between trailing 12 month EPS and stock prices. Stock prices have led trailing EPS, not the other way around. So why should the market be concerned about an earnings recession in Q3 that's old news?

Business Insider recently featured a story about how "the stock market is finally making sense" by highlighting the relationship between stock prices (green bars) and quarterly EPS estimate revisions (blue bars).

Ro was puzzled about the past disconnect between how past negative EPS revisions did not lead to price declines, but noted that in the long run, stock prices are driven by EPS expectations:

But lately, the stock market has started to make intuitive sense again as we witnessed prices fall along with earnings estimates....

In the long run, the relationship between stock prices and earnings seem to revert to long-term averages. This is good news for patient investors who are willing and able to ride out short-term swings in the market as they wait for value to come into fruition.

But in the short run, you're taking a big gamble trading on the assumption that these things work themselves out in a timely manner.

h3 Estimates have always fallen/h3
Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

The "rookie" mistake that Sam Ro made is that he didn't realize that EPS estimates tend to start high and fall over time. This chart from Ed Yardeni shows the past patterns of EPS estimates for any single fiscal year (blue squiggles) since 1995. EPS estimates for any single period, whether it's a fiscal year or fiscal quarter, start high and have a tendency to fall. It is therefore not unusual at all to see estimate revisions stay negative for any single FY or FQ.