The Grinch May Steal The Christmas Rally
Richard Shaw | Nov 23, 2015 04:56AM ET
Breadth tends to tell you where you are going in a market. Breadth is sending negative signals.
The direction of breadth has diverged from the direction of the market-cap weighted indexes (indexes dominated by a few giant stocks, like Apple (O:AAPL) and Exxon (N:XOM)) creating the negative warning signal).
Breadth is moving down and the market-cap indexes are mostly flat for the year, with a recent strong rally from a short-term correction — but the indexes have still been unable to exceed their mid-year highs. Breadth may be the Grinch that steals the Christmas rally.
These charts show the deteriorating underpinnings of the US stock market.
Each chart shows the distance of the S&P 500 price from its trailing 1 year high in orange (using right scale); and a parameter of breadth of the S&P 1500 (large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap combined) in gray for the end-of-week value, and in dashed black for the 13-week average (3 months) of that weekly value (using left scale).
h3 MEDIAN S&P 1500 STOCK/h3This first chart shows the distance of the median S&P 1500 stock from its trailing 1 year high.
You can see in the orange line that the S&P 500 had its Correction in August, but that the median S&P 1500 stock began its slide from its trailing 1-year high near the beginning of the year, giving a warning. The median has recovered somewhat on a weekly basis, but is still declining of a 13-week basis.
The median stock is off its 1-year trailing high by more than 13% as of Friday, and about 16% on a 13-week average basis. This compares to the S&P 500 index being off a bit less than 2% from its trailing high.
At the end of 2014, the median stock was down only 4% on that Friday, and 8% on a 13-week basis — a lot better than the 13% and 16% now. The median stock was also off its high by 4% at the beginning of 2014. Much damage has been incurred this year.
This is an important divergence. The median is falling while the market-cap weighted index dominated by the giant companies is essentially flat and attempting to reach prior highs. How long can the giant companies do well if many smaller companies do not? Generally the answer is not too long.
Let’s look at some other breath time series.
h3 S&P 1500 STOCK WITHIN 2% of HIGH/h3
Get The News You Want
This chart tracks the percentage of S&P 1500 stocks that are within 2% of their trailing 1 year high. That too began to slide downward months before the S&P 500 Correction, and continues its downward slide. The weekly value has risen from its correction low, but is proportionately still in a much weaker recovery than the S&P 500. This is an important negative divergence and warning signal.
Approximately 15% of the S&P 1500 are within 2% of their trialing high, and about 8% are that close on a trailing 13-week basis, but that compares to approximately 40% and 23% at the end of 2014. That’s a large deterioration for the top end performers.
h3 S&P 1500 STOCKS in CORRECTION or WORSE/h3Now let’s look at the weak performers — those in a Corrector or worse (10% or more below their 1-year trailing high).
The S&P 500 is well out of Correction territory, but a majority of the stocks in the S&P 1500 are not, as this chart shows — note the gray and dashed black lines are using an inverted scale to more clearly show the divergence. That charting method makes the plot turn down as the number of stocks in Correction goes up (condition goes worse).
Fully 60% of the S&P 1500 stocks are down 10% or more from their highs, and 68% are down that much on a 13-week average basis. At the end of 2014, the numbers were 34% and 45%; and only 25% on the first Friday of 21014.
Once again, we see a big deterioration. And, simply on the face of it; well more than half of the S&P 1500 in still in Correction. That is not encouraging for the giant companies, that can only outpace the pack by so much for so long, after which their performances must come closer together — either by the pack catching up or the leaders coming down.
h3 S&P 1500 STOCKS in BEAR or WORSE/h3What about those in Bear or worse territory (down 20% or more)? That doesn’t look so good either.
Currently 37% are in a Bear or worse as of last Friday, and 40% are in that condition on a 13-week average basis. That compares to only 19% and 23% at the end of 2014; and only 8% on the first Friday of 2014.
This chart uses an inverted left scale like the last chart to show negative conditions by a downward plot.
That Bear statistic did not give forewarning, as the median and 2% off of high and Correction statistics did, but it is giving warning now that the situation is not getting better under the surface of the S&P 1500; and by indirection that is a bad sign for the near future of the S&P 500.
h3 S&P 1500 STOCKS in SEVERE BEAR CONDITIONS/h3Now let’s look at stocks in really tough shape — those down 30% or more from their trailing 1-year highs. That is an ugly chart too. This also uses an inverted left scale.
At the beginning of 2014, only 3% of the S&P 1500 stocks were in a Severe Bear condition (below their trailing 1-year high by 30% or more). By the end of 2014, that number had risen to 10% on an end-of-week basis, and 11% on a 13-week average basis. However, now the statistic is 23% as of last Friday, and 22% on a 13-week average basis. That’s a serious deterioration.
h3 BOTTOM LINE/h3The bottom line is that below the surface of the market-cap weighted indexes — the indexes the daily business reports publish — there is a deeply troubling breakdown.
The majority of stocks are not doing anywhere near as well at the giant stocks, and many are doing just terribly. This divergence must resolve – it always does. The top can come down or the bottom can come up, but the performance gap is too large and growing to be sustained long-term.
There is a possibility of, and perhaps an historical tendency for, a Christmas rally in the market-cap indexes, but we see the distinct possibility to probability of the Grinch stealing Christmas.
As a consequence we continue to hold above average cash positions, but are nibbling on high quality, low volatility, value oriented, above average yield, consistent dividend paying domestic stocks with strong brand equity, and believably sustainable businesses, that have been around long enough to have proven they can weather strong storms.
We certainly could be wrong in our short-term view — holiday spirit can be a powerful force, and who knows what the Fed, the ECB, China, Russia and ISIS have in store for us; but trying to be data driven, and needing/wanting to preserve capital as much as make it grow; we are sticking with our cautious view for now
h3 POST-SCRIPT:/h3Here are some noise canceling charts of the S&P 1500, and its three components indexes, the S&P 500 large-caps, S&P 400 mid-caps and S&P 600 small-caps that show in their own way that the smaller market-cap weighted stocks are well behind the large-cap stocks.
The charts cancel “noise” by only plotting a change in price when it moves by more than a certain amount (the 14-day average true range in this case). They do not plot time on the horizontal, just new equal size “boxes” for each incremental price change greater than the selected amount (the 14-day average true range).
A second traditional set of charts plots the market-weighted version and equal weighted version of the S&P 500 and of the Russell 2000 small-caps, to further show that the bulk of stocks in the major indexes are falling behind the larger members to dominate the index quotes you see and hear on TV and radio and read in the business press.
Both the S&P 500 and the S&P 1500 are massively dominated by a handful of mega-cap companies such as Apple (O:AAPL) and Exxon (N:XOM). As a result they have similar performance.
S&P 500 Large-Cap (via SPDR S&P 500 ETF (N:SPY))
S&P 1500 All-Cap ( via iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Market (N:ITOT))
S&P 400 Mid-Cap (via SPDR S&P MidCap 400 (N:MDY))
S&P 600 Small-Cap (via iShares Core S&P Small-Cap (N:IJR))
S&P 500 Equal Weight vs Market-Cap Weight (via Guggenheim Invest S&P 500 Equal Weight (N:RSP) equal weight and SPY)
Russell 2000 Equal Weight vs Market-Cap Weight (Guggenheim Invest Russell 2000 Equal Weight (N:EWRS) equal weight and iShares Russell 2000 (N:IWM))
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.