The Best And Worst Of The Mid Cap Blend Style 2Q16
David Trainer | Jun 03, 2016 01:44AM ET
The Mid Cap Blend style ranks fifth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 1Q16 Style Ratings here.
Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Mid Cap Blend style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 14 to 3281). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.
Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Blend style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.
Five ETFs are excluded from Figure 1 because total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. See our ETF screener for more details.
Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best and Worst Ratings – Top 5
* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.
Five mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. See our mutual fund screener for more details.
PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSE:XMLV) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and Invesco Mid Cap Core Equity Fund (GTAFX) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. XMLV earns a Neutral rating and GTAFX earns an Attractive rating.
Guggenheim Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (NYSE:RYJ) is the worst rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and RBC Mid Cap Value Fund (RBMAX) is the worst rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. RYJ earns a Dangerous rating and RBMAX earns a Very Dangerous rating.
Torchmark Corporation (NYSE:TMK: $58/share) is one of our favorite stocks held by GTAFX and earns an Attractive rating. Torchmark may not be flashy, but it has been consistent in growing profits. Since 1998, Torchmark has grown after-tax profit (ROIC ) every year since 1998 and currently earns a 13% ROIC.
Get The News You Want
Torchmark has also generated positive PEBV ) ratio of 1.0.
This ratio means that the market expects Torchmark’s NOPAT never to meaningfully grow from its current levels. If Torchmark can grow NOPAT by just 4% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $73/share today – a 26% upside.
United States Cellular Corp (NYSE:USM: $43/share) is one of our least favorite stocks held by RYJ and earns a Dangerous rating. Since 2006, United States Cellular’s NOPAT has declined by 4% compounded annually. Its ROIC has fallen from an already low 5% in 2006 to a bottom-quintile 2% over the last twelve months.
Worst of all, USM has never generated positive grow NOPAT by 9% compounded annually for the next 16 years . Given years of profit decline, this expectation seems overly optimistic.
Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds.
Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds
Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds
Disclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.