Large Cap Blend Style 2Q16: The Best And The Worst
David Trainer | May 29, 2016 04:07AM ET
The Large Cap Blend style ranks second out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 1Q16 Style Ratings here.
Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Large Cap Blend style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 16 to 3810). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.
Investors seeking exposure to the Large Cap Blend style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
WisdomTree Total Earnings (NYSE:EXT), FlexShares US Quality Large Cap (NASDAQ:QLC), and SPDR MSCI USA Quality Mix (NYSE:QUS) are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.
Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average (NYSE:DIA) is the top-rated Large Cap Blend ETF and Financial Investors Trust Vulcan Value Partners Fund (VVPLX) is the top-rated Large Cap Blend mutual fund. Both earn a Very Attractive rating.
First Trust Mega Cap AlphaDEX (NASDAQ:FMK) is the worst rated Large Cap Blend ETF and AmericaFirst Seasonal Trends Fund (STQAX) is the worst rated Large Cap Blend mutual fund. FMK earns a Neutral rating and STQAX earns a Very Dangerous rating.
Franklin Resources (NYSE:BEN: $38/share) is one of our favorite stocks held by VVPLX and earns a Very Attractive rating. Over the past decade, Franklin Resources has grown after-tax profit (NOPAT) by 8% compounded annually. The company has improved its return on invested capital (ROIC) from 21% in 2005 to a top-quintile 26% over the last twelve months. Possibly most impressive, Franklin has generated positive economic earnings in every year since 2003. Despite the success, BEN remains undervalued. At its current price of $38/share, Franklin Resources has a price-to-economic book value (PEBV) ratio of 0.8. This ratio means that the market expects Franklin’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 20%. If Franklin Resources can grow NOPAT by 3% compounded annually over the next decade, the stock is worth $60/share today – a 58% upside.
Get The News You Want
NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG: $15/share) is one of our least favorite stocks held by EQAL and earns a Dangerous rating. Since 2006, NRG’s NOPAT has declined by 1% compounded annually. The company’s ROIC has fallen from 9% in 2006 to a bottom-quintile 2% over the last twelve months. Additionally, over the past five years, NRG has generated a cumulative -$10.8 billion in free cash flow. Despite these operational struggles, NRG remains overvalued. To justify its current price of $15/share, NRG must grow NOPAT by 9% compounded annually for the next 11 years.
Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Large Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds.
Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
Disclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.