Tepper Calls An Audible On The Bond Market

 | Sep 08, 2014 12:35AM ET

We've made the case before (see here ) that for all the pomp and circumstance, Fed policy over the last three decades has done very little to deviate yields from what became a genuinely symmetrical and balanced return from the profound 1981 highs. Where they have had effect— we would argue—is around the fringe, by introducing volatility to the slope of the decline, with numerous interventions and surprises as they navigated various market conditions.

The chart referenced below of the U.S. 10-Year with the 1941 to 1981 mirrored trajectory captures that story, especially when contrasted with the relative smoothness of the previous long-term cycle in the first half of the 20th century, when the Fed was still in its infancy and developing the first edition textbook of accommodation and reduction, which they have continued to build upon with each passing cycle.  

On both sides of the spectrum—whether through bailouts, interventions or rate tightenings—the Fed has looked to shake the tree from time to time when the markets are deemed too complacent, accommodative or risk adverse. Coincidentally, or not, these occasions over the last thirty years have been when yields have fallen back proximate to the mirror of the cycle.

Has it been beneficial? We'll save that nuanced argument for the historians, but do believe it demonstrates quite clearly the nature versus nurture aspect of the Treasury market. The Fed may find efficacy with the cattle prod at times, but the herd of the largest security market in the world will still closely follow the inherent migration pattern - one that many analysts, pundits and traders have attempted to call an audible from over the years.