S&P 500 Squirms as Gold Firms: What's Next?
Mark Mead Baillie | Oct 30, 2023 02:38AM ET
Welcome to this week’s missive featuring your favorite end-of-month graphics as we put the wraps on October, (albeit with two trading days in the balance followed by Wednesday’s EuroSide holiday). Sadly as the Mid-East mayhem continues, the safe-haven bid has further fed into the price of Gold toward settling yesterday (Friday) at 2016, the highest weekly close since 05 May.
However, per this piece’s title, as is our occasional wont we start with stocks, specifically as regards the S&P 500’s state of squirm. To wit from the “‘Tis Not About Us Dept.” you may recall that herein penned back on 22 July:
- “As we tweeted (@deMeadvillePro) last Thursday [20 July]: S&P only -0.7% today (Thu) but the MoneyFlow drain was the most for any one day since 13 Sep ’22. Suggests near-term top is in place.”
Of course you regular website readers know the MoneyFlow is a directionally-leading characteristic of the S&P 500 which had settled this past 20 July at 4535. From whence, ’tis all gone rather wrong as depicted by the following daily graphic of the S&P’s closings year-to-date:
Indeed since that tweet, the S&P 500 has declined -9.2% (from 4535 to now 4117). However for the moment, the S&P has become “textbook oversold” such that it perhaps gets a bounce before the next trounce. That’s technically.
But fundamentally our “live” price/earnings ratio of the S&P 500 remains high in the sky at 34.6x. And to be sure, Q3 earnings season isn’t helping the situation, regardless of the FinMedia’s fawning. For example: last evening, once-revered Barron’s ran with “Why a Solid Earnings Season Isn’t Good Enough for the Stock Market”. But because we actually do the math, of 596 companies (including 226 S&P constituents) having thus far reported for Q3, just 51% have bettered Q3 of a year ago. That’s considered “Solid”?
Get The News You Want
“But 67% beat estimates, mmb…”
You know Squire had that comment ready to go. But were we ever to risk dipping a toe into the equities market, we’d desire our shareholdings to be in companies that grow the bottom line rather than shrink it. Yet such has been the illogical lean to the latter that exists in today’s Investing Age of Stoopid. Nuff said. To Gold we go.
And what better segue than to bring up the BEGOS Markets standings year-to-date, Gold having moved from fourth position just at September’s end to now first, +10.2% to this point in 2023. (Note therein the Dollar Index being +3.0% which by conventional wisdom doesn’t happen when Gold rises except for the fact that “Gold plays no currency favourites” as you regular readers well know). ‘Course the Bond has been creamed, price -12.1% in 2023 whilst yield has risen from 3.975% at year-end 2022 to now 5.023%. As for Sister Silver lacking pace, she’s not getting the geo-political gain garnered by Gold, especially with Cousin Copper on the skids. Here’s the whole gang:
As for Gold’s weekly bars from a year ago-to-date, we’ve locked in the rightmost second blue dot of the new parabolic Long trend, the prior Long trend having failed miserably only to have then been saved by an equally poor trend (the three red dots) for the Shorts. Although we’re rah-rahing away there, should there hopefully be some resolution to the Mid-East mayhem, Gold typically would then drop like a stone. For as we opined a week ago, Gold shan’t become moon-bound until the current All-Time High (2089) is eclipsed; thus it remains for now range-bound, all as herein detailed a week ago. Either way, from Gold’s recent low just on 06 October at 1824, price has since risen to as high (yesterday) as 2020, or +10.7% in 16 trading days. Here are the weeklies:
Now let’s stay in the year ago-to-date mode in turning to Gold and its percentage track along with those of top-tier precious metals companies, wherein not all have positively fared. From the bottom up we’ve Newmont Goldcorp Corp (NYSE:NEM) -11%, Pan American Silver (NYSE:PAAS) -9%, the Global X Silver Miners ETF (NYSE:SIL) -4%, Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) +9%, Franco-Nevada Corporation (NYSE:FNV) +10%, the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners exchange-traded fund (GDX (NYSE:GDX)) +16%, and Gold itself +21% from this day a year ago. What stands stark in this construct is all these equities lagging Gold! Simply look mid-chart ’round May when Gold was as high as ’tis now, but every equity itself was materially higher than now! The expression may go: “Dere’s Gold in dem dere hills!”, but dere’s real value in dem dere equities! Wow!
Meanwhile, is the StateSide economy Golden? Ehhhh, not really.
“But the Econ Baro had a good week, ehhhh mmb?”
Indeed it did Squire. In fact, of the ten incoming metrics for our Economic Barometer, eight of them improved period-over-period. However, let’s focus on two of those “improvers”. First is the first peek at Q3 Gross Domestic Product: an annualized +4.7% real growth. Impressive. However, again as we do the math: 42% of the otherwise unreported nominal +8.4% growth pace was due strictly to inflation. Unimpressive. And the so-called “Fed-favoured” Core Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index — after increasing just +0.1% in August — leapt by +0.3% for September: annualized that’s +3.6% and the 12-month summation is +3.5%. Yes, the latter is a two-year low … but is it near the Federal Reserve’s target of +2.0%? No. Still, our best guess for Wednesday’s Open Market Committee Policy Statement is that they’ll unanimously again lie low. Heaven forbid the Fed actually be ahead of the curve. Here’s the Baro:
Let’s next go ’round the horn for all eight components that comprise the BEGOS Markets. Here we’ve their daily bars across the past 21 trading days (one month). Each market has its grey linear regression trendline, four at present rising (Euro, Swiss Franc, Gold, and Silver) and four thus falling (Bond, Copper, Oil, and S&P 500). Of Course, the consistency of each trend is denoted by the “Baby Blues” which specifically for the Swiss Franc have just dipped below their +80% axis, suggestive of a cheaper Franc near-term. Is that merely coincident that the FOMC may just raise rates, in turn increasing Dollar strength? ‘Tis one of those things that makes us go “Hmmmm”:
We’ve already alluded to the white metal not getting the geo-political bid that’s been boosting the yellow metal, the Gold/Silver ratio now 86.8x vs. its millenium-to-date average of 67.8x. Priced to that average, Silver today at 23.24 would instead be +22% higher at 29.73, (just in case yer scorin’ at home). Reflective below of Sister Silver not keeping pace is price being mid-10-Day Profile on the right whereas Gold essentially tops its stack on the left:
So with but two trading days remaining in October, here now is our stratified Gold Structure by the month across these past dozen years. As of previously shown, now courtesy of the “Here We Go Again Dept.” we’ve Gold’s triple top which “is meant to be broken” as highlighted by the three Golden arrows. Moreover, we’ve anticipated on occasion throughout this year’s missives that Gold shall record a fresh All-Time High in 2023: obviously, the momentum is there, barring a post-geo-political price retrenchment (as is the rule rather than the exception). Nonetheless, let’s cue Elvis from back in ’60 with “It’s now or never”:
Through these 10-months we’ve emphasized the importance of doing the math to get to the truth of such critical metrics as economic inputs, P/E calculations, and so forth. And whilst nothing light can be made of the horrific Mid-East mayhem, as this past week unfolded a mathematical “challenge” shall we say “came to light” over at the United States Department of State. Hat-tip ExecutiveGov reported: “The Department of State has issued an advisory cautioning United States citizens against travel to more than 200 countries amid rising geopolitical tensions and conflict.” Of Course, you can see where this is going, given (hat-tip Quora) stating: "Today, there are 197 countries in the world" The bottom line here is: if you’re in the States, you’re sorta stuck from going anywhere, nor beyond! Best therefore not to squirm; rather stay firm and stuck in Gold!
Cheers!
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.