Should You Currency Hedge Stock And Bond Funds?

 | Apr 28, 2015 05:25AM ET

  • Foreign bonds are almost always better to currency hedge so they can fulfill their volatility moderation role
  • Foreign stocks are generally best hedged in retirement, and may be better unhedged during long-term periodic accumulation
  • Currency exposure is best pursued directly in FX or currency futures contracts
  • On balance, dollar-based investors owning foreign assets hedged back to the USD is generally a good idea.

    In the case of bonds, we think currency hedging is virtually always a good idea.

    In the case of stocks, we think it is typically a good idea, unless you believe you have the time and skill to switch back and forth profitably between hedged and non-hedge stocks — and that you have the discipline and emotional strength and consistency to deal with the whipsaws that come with that approach. Alternatively, you may find actively managed funds that effectively adjust their portfolio back and forth between hedged and unhedged.

    For those in the accumulation stage with long-time horizons and doing Dollar-Cost-Averaging; the extra volatility of unhedged foreign equities could be an advantage. Volatility is helpful with regular periodic investing, and harmful with regular, periodic withdrawal. Therefore, retirees are better served by the volatility reduction that dollar hedging is supposed to provide.

    The array of hedge funds has proliferated and a review of unhedged fund substitution with hedged funds for suitability is advisable

    h3 Hedging Equities:/h3

    Currency hedging equities is a two-edged sword. When the dollar is rising, hedged funds outperform unhedged funds. When the dollar is falling, hedged funds underperform unhedged funds.

    There have been prolonged periods where one approach or the other has been superior, but in the very long-term the currency effect may be a wash.

    These two charts based on MSCI indexes (one for Eurozone stocks and one for Japanese stocks) show the cumulative and monthly return differences from 1999 through March 2015: