Should The U.S. Lift The Ban On Crude Oil Exports?

 | May 29, 2014 05:30AM ET

There is a growing debate over lifting the US ban on crude oil exports. Recently, US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said he thought it time to review the prudence of the exports ban during the 2014 quadrennial review of US energy policies. Not everyone has responded favorably to the calls to ease the ban so expect a loud debate over the year ahead.

For more than thirty years, the United States has banned crude oil exports. The logic at the time was energy security concern both from sending oil to foreign markets rather than using it here at home and a fear that crude oil exports would simply mean higher crude oil import to fuel our growing economy. Some of the laws on the books limited crude oil exports date back to the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. Others were adopted in the 1970’s in response to the Arab oil embargo including the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, and the Export Administration Act of 1979. Federal rules in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the Department of Commerce also impose export restrictions.

Clearly, times have changed since the frustration of long lines and spiking prices at gasoline stations in the 1970’s in the aftermath of the Arab Oil Embargo. Today, the US is in the midst of a boom in domestic oil production from tight oil and shale development. The problem now is that there is too much of the wrong type of oil (heavy imported crude versus light sweet tight crude oil) in the wrong places (Gulf coast versus North Dakota) to fit the energy infrastructure in place to serve market needs since those 1970’s days.

US oil markets are filling with crude from tight oil in North Dakota and Texas. The market is trying to rationalize changes brought about by this surge as pipelines reverse direction to ease the bottleneck at Cushing, Oklahoma and reduce the WTI-Brent spread.

h2 Figure 1:  Annual Energy Outlook 2014 US Crude Oil Production/h2