Seeking The Highest Option Premiums Is A Losing Strategy

 | Feb 11, 2018 01:27AM ET

One of the common mistakes made by covered call writers and put-sellers is to make investment decisions based primarily on the highest premium returns. Certainly, we all want to generate the highest levels of success but only when factoring in the risk we will be incurring. This article will look at high premium returns from the perspective of the underlying security as well as from the perspective of the “moneyness” of an out-of-the-money strike .

Time value profit and implied volatility of the underlying security

Our implied volatility of the underlying security. This means that the higher the percentage return, the greater the downside risk. Generally, implied volatility (IV) statistics are based on a 1-year time frame and 1 standard deviation (accurate two-thirds of the time). If a stock shows an implied volatility of 25% and is trading at $60.00, the expected price range over the next year would be between $45.00 and $75.00, 67% of the time. Another $60.00 stock with an implied volatility of 10% would have an anticipated price range of $54.00 to $66.00. There is no need to look up or calculate implied volatility stats because we can glean the degree of risk by looking at our option returns based on our cost basis. I set a goal for initial 1-month returns for near-the-money strikes of 2-4% per month. I will go a bit higher in bull market environments (up to 6%). In my mother’s more conservative portfolio, I set a goal of 1-2% for 1-month returns. Below is a screenshot of a section of the BCI Premium ETF Report for exchange-traded funds. Pages 7-8 shows the implied volatilities which can be compared to that of the overall market (S&P 500):