Running A Fossil Fuel Business Isn’t What It Used to Be

 | Sep 20, 2021 04:46PM ET

It’s becoming more and more difficult to be in the fossil fuel business. On both sides of the Atlantic, law-makers and unelected bureaucrats are turning up the heat, so to speak, on companies over the issue of climate change.

In the U.S. House of Representatives, Democrats have launched an inquiry into whether oil companies have participated in so-called “climate disinformation.” Last week, letters were sent to top executives of Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), BP (NYSE:BP), Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Royal Dutch Shell (LON:RDSa) seeking records, and hearings are scheduled for next month.

Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to propose a series of new disclosure requirements all publicly traded companies must make, possibly as soon as year-end, to inform investors about potential climate risks associated with their business.

In Europe, the strategy appears to be to choke off any and all lending to the fossil fuel industry. Next year, the European Central Bank is expected to look into the trading operations of major banks in what’s being called a climate “stress test,” and at least one big activist investor group, ShareAction, is pressuring lenders to cut all ties to fossil fuels.

Of course, none of this accounts for the fact that fossil fuels still supply around 80% of the world’s energy.

Or that many leading oil and gas producers are investing billions in renewable energy, including wind and solar, and energy storage technology. Chevron, in fact, just unveiled plans to triple its investment in lower carbon energies to $10 billion through 2028.

Could Climate Scientists Be Held Liable?

Climate change was top of mind at the Gold Forum Americas conference I attended and spoke at last week in Denver.

In conversations I had with some of my peers, the question was raised whether certain scientists could be held financially liable for spreading their own “climate disinformation,” which has sown fear and prompted policy-makers to enact new draconian taxes and regulations.

Here’s how one colleague put it: In nearly every other profession—from physician to engineer to money manager—there are mechanisms in place to hold bad actors accountable. Why is that not the case with scientists, who may make promissory or misleading statements that materially impact individuals and businesses?

The idea sounds farfetched, but it’s not completely unheard of. In 2012, an Italian court found six seismologists guilty of manslaughter for failing to give proper warning of an earthquake that killed some 300 people. This ruling was overturned in 2014, but it had the effect of putting public facing scientists around the world on high alert.

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

To be clear, I don’t support charging scientists with crimes. Modern technology, as advanced as it is, still cannot successfully predict earthquakes with any degree of certainty.

Fewer, Not More, Hurricanes Making Landfall In U.S.

Perhaps the same is true of the climate. We are led to believe that climate change is responsible for causing more hurricanes, for instance. But if you look at the Environmental Protection Agency’s own data, you’ll find that the number of North Atlantic hurricanes that strike the U.S. every year has been trending down over the past 120 years. To date, the deadliest natural disaster in U.S. history remains the Great Galveston hurricane, which pummelled the Texas city in 1900, several years before Henry Ford even began mass producing the Model T.