Rolling Out-And-Up After Understanding The Math

 | Jan 01, 2017 01:17AM ET

Elite covered call writers understand the importance of position management in maximizing returns. As a result, I receive a significant number of inquiries regarding exit strategy execution. This article will highlight one such question I received from John, which has two components to it. The main item relates to rolling-out-and-up, a frequently-used exit strategy in our arsenal. The second aspect of John’s question I will address first because it caught my attention and I needed to get an answer before I addressed the main issue of rolling options. Here’s John’s question See if you can find my mathematical concern:

John’s question

I own 300 shares of FIVE (NASDAQ:FIVE) at $40.26 and sold the $38.00 call for a net of $434.00 for the three contracts. FIVE is now trading at $43.99 and wondering if I am better off being assigned or rolling out-and-up to the $44.00 strike for a net premium of $510.00 ($170.00 per contract). The cost-to-close is $670.00 per contract. I am bullish on the stock. Can you help?

Why does the math seem erroneous?

Did you find why I am puzzled? It’s in the very first sentence of John’s question. With share price at $40.26, the $38.00 strike is $2.26 intrinsic value plus a time value component. That computes to $678.00 plus time value. However, John received only $434.00. The math tells us a story. John bought FIVE for $40.26 but didn’t sell the call at the same time. He waited and watched share value decline and then sold the option…had to be. Yes, this was confirmed by John.

Should we roll out-and-up?

This aspect is made easy by using the “What Now” tab of the Ellman Calculator: