Red Screens Vs. The Big Picture
Chris Ciovacco | Jun 19, 2018 02:53PM ET
As human beings, we all tend to focus on what is in front of us. During the session on Tuesday, June 19, this is what we saw:
One of the keys to making more prudent and rational decisions is to look at more than just the red screen in front of us, which represents only one timeframe (the shortest). It can also be helpful to think in extremes. Let's assume the gloom-and-doomers are correct in their never-ending assertion that:
- Stocks are wildly overvalued.
- We are in one of the biggest bubbles in history.
- The S&P 500 is in the process of forming a major top.
- A trade war and the end of QE will take down risk assets.
- A decline in stocks on the order of 50% is just around the corner.
- The market leader, tech, is extremely vulnerable.
If the S&P 500's peak on January 26, 2018 (144 days ago) was the beginning of the end for the bull market, a 50% decline is coming, and the long-term uptrend in tech is ending, we would expect many market participants to be seeking shelter in safe-haven assets, such as gold, which is exactly what happened after the peak in 2007. Notice in the chart below how the conviction to own growth-oriented tech stocks had weakened considerably relative to the conviction to own armageddon-friendly gold 144 days after the market peaked in October 2007. The trend clearly flipped toward bearish outcomes in late November 2007; after that really bad things happened in the stock market.
h3 PowerShares QQQ Trust Series 1 Vs. SPDR Gold Shares/h3
In the 2007 case above, the S&P 500 dropped over 50% and the tech-heavy NASDAQ dropped over 55%, which aligns nicely with the gloom-and-doom forecast for 2018. Therefore, since the chart above shows bullish conviction relative to armageddon conviction 144 days after the market peaked in 2007, if the odds in 2018 favored bearish outcomes, we would expect to see a similar and gloomy turn 144 days after the market peak in 2018, which is not the case (see below). The present-day chart still has a full-bore bullish look, which is in sharp contrast to the full-bore bearish look 144 days after the peak in 2007.
Get The News You Want
In 2007, 144 days after the peak, the bears were clearly in control. In 2018, 144 days after the peak, the long-term trend clearly favors the tech bulls (QQQ) relative to the armageddon bears (GLD). The quote below sheds some additional light on the charts above.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.— Daniel Patrick Moynihan
h3 Broad Market Looks Nothing Like 2007-08/h3The subheading above may sound like a bold statement. However, the statement is clearly supported by the facts. The S&P 500 peaked on October 9, 2007. The chart below shows the same moving averages 144 days after the peak; the bears were clearly in control.
h3 S&P 500/h3In 2018, the S&P 500 peaked on January 26. June 19 is 144 days after the 2018 peak in the stock market. If the market was rolling over and heading for a 50% drop, we would expect the chart below to be taking on similar characteristics observable in the chart above, which is not the case. In the upper right hand corner of the chart below, we can see the 25 point drop in the S&P 500 that was taking place intraday on June 19. With some additional and longer-term context, the 25 point drop does not seem nearly as concerning.
/h3
The broader the evidence, the more convincing the case. This week's video hosts the World Cup of Markets. The first round consists of 16 risk-on vs. risk-off matches, allowing us to get a better read on the weight of the evidence.
This week's video walks through all 16 matches, giving us a better understanding of how concerned market participants are about a trade war and the end of QE.
/h2
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.