US Municipal Debt Report Card for 2017

 | Jul 02, 2017 06:22AM ET

As budget season comes to a close, there were 14 states joining Illinois that still had not finalized their budgets by the time of this writing. Illinois, which has received numerous downgrades because it has not had a budget in two years and has amassed a large backlog of receivables, could possibly lose its investment-grade rating if it does not pass a budget.

On a somewhat positive side, Morgan Stanley’s Muni Early Tax Analysis (META) indicator of state general fund collections rose 4% in May, reversing three months of weak data. This trend is consistent with their economists’ predictions of 2Q economic growth at 2.9%, compared with 1Q growth of 1.2%. The authors caution that it may be too early to declare an end to the trend of revenue weakness, especially with summer upon us; but we will keep an eye on this.

State Rating Actions

Again the quarter was highlighted by a number of state downgrades, including a few repeat offenders that by now may not surprise our readers.

Illinois has been downgraded three times since the beginning of the year. The most recent actions were triggered by the state’s failure to pass a budget by May 31. Moody’s and S&P both downgraded the state to Baa3/BBB-; and, significantly, appropriation-backed debt was downgraded to non-investment-grade. If the state does not arrive at a budget, S&P has indicated that it could downgrade the state again, bringing it to non-investment-grade. The state average is in the AA category.

New Jersey was downgraded by Moody’s to A3 on March 27, the day our Q1 2017 commentary (http://cumber.com/municipal-credit-first-quarter-2017-review/ ) was released. The downgrade reflects the continued negative impact of significant pension underfunding, persistent structural imbalance, and weak fund balance. The outlook on the state’s rating was changed to stable over the next 12 to 18 months, on the expectation that, in the short term, economic performance will be solid and any budget gaps manageable, whereas in the long run the credit profile will weaken as long-term liabilities (pensions and debt) grow.

Connecticut’s rating was cut in May to A1/A+/A by Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch, respectively. The downgrades were essentially based on an erosion of the state’s finances, including the drawing down of its rainy day fund, and reduced expectations for economic and revenue performance over the medium term, leading to reduced fiscal flexibility. The trend on the ratings was changed to stable, based on the state’s broad economic base and expectations that it will proactively manage its financial operations. Although the state is losing population, it remains the wealthiest state in the nation, based on per capita personal income.

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

Massachusetts was downgraded to AA from AA+ by S&P as a result of the state’s failure to replenish reserve funds as planned, highlighting to S&P that the state may be moving away from its stated fiscal policies. Large reserves help states and municipalities move through a cycle.

Alaska’s AA+ rating was placed on CreditWatch negative by S&P on June 19, reflecting its view that the state could remain structurally imbalanced for fiscal 2018 based on its budget negotiations impasse. Without structural fiscal reforms in the 2017 legislative session, S&P would likely lower the state’s debt rating.

Mississippi’s S&P outlook on its AA rating was changed to negative from stable on weakness in the state’s revenue trends, even as the state manages budget reductions and incremental revenue loss from the implementation of recent tax changes. The negative outlook also reflects the declining trajectory of the state's pension-funding ratios.

Pension Funding

One of the continuing and pressing issues for state and local governments is pension funding. The chart below, from the most recent (April 2017) Pew Charitable Trust report, shows the states with the best- and worst-funded pension plans. When states experience low investment returns compared with earnings assumptions, unfunded pension liabilities balloon, increasing the size of required annual contributions to pension funds. These annual contributions compete with other expenditures; and because they are not immediate needs, states sometimes postpone the contribution or make one smaller than required to correct the shortfall. California recently bucked that trend by approving a budget that includes $12 billion in payments to its largest pension fund to help reduce future unfunded liabilities. As the following chart shows, not all states have low pension funded ratios.