Nomura, RBS Appeals Against $839M Mortgage Bond Case

 | Nov 21, 2016 05:14AM ET

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York is anticipated to turn down the appeal made by two of the world’s biggest banks – Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:NMR) and The Royal Bank of Scotland (LON:RBS) Group plc (TO:RBS) regarding to a settlement agreed in 2015. Per the terms of the settlement, the banks were ordered to pay $839 million over misrepresentation of documents in selling of mortgage backed securities.

Notably, the banks were accused by the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (‘FHFA’) of providing fraudulent details regarding mortgages sold to the government-backed mortgage financiers, Federal National Mortgage Association (OTC:FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (OTC:FMCC) .

David Tulchin, Nomura's lawyer argued, "The district court excluded all evidence that Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or any reasonable investor standing in their shoes knew about the underwriting practices at the time."

U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Wesley retorted with the statement "Couldn't Fannie and Freddie rely on you to do your job?"

The members of the three-judge panel enquired Tulchin and RBS's lawyer as to how the banks were not guilty if the quality of the loans represented by them on which Fannie and Freddie relied on while buying the mortgage bonds were fraudulent.

Background

The FHFA has accused the Japan-based Nomura, sponsor of the above mentioned securities, and Royal Bank of Scotland, the underwriter, of providing it with misleading details about securities worth $2 billion. Both were found guilty in May by U.S. District Judge, Denise Cote, in Manhattan after a non-jury trial and were directed to pay $806 million including $26.6 million to Fannie Mae and $779.4 million to Freddie Mac. Further, in Sep 2015, they were directed to pay an additional $33 million over and above $806 million.

Many financial institutions resorted to inappropriate, misleading, aggressive and fraudulent methods to boost their mortgage operations during the pre-crisis period that fuelled the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Consequently, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae reached the brink of bankruptcy and the government intervened to rescue these lenders.

In order to avoid such fiascos in the future, the regulators started implementing stringent restrictions. Consequently in 2011, the FHFA sued 18 financial organizations, including Wall Street majors like The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS), Inc. Zacks Investment Research

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.

Sign out
Are you sure you want to sign out?
NoYes
CancelYes
Saving Changes