Market Weekly: When Yields Rise, Narratives Fall

 | Mar 07, 2021 12:43AM ET

The big story of the past couple of weeks is rising bond yields. Everyone’s talking about it. Everyone’s got a theory about it. Even me.

Why are yields rising? What does rising yields mean?

But, to this point I’ve kept my mouth mostly shut on this, at least in public. I reserve my gut reactions for my Patrons , giving us the opportunity to work through ideas.

The financial press industry is obsessed with gut reactions because headlines are all that matters. It used to just be to sell newspapers or generate clicks. But now, with algorithmic trading, headlines are the market.

Central banks and politicians use their pulpit in real time to stick save markets or push them in whatever direction they want them to go — at least in the near term.

So do short-sellers, media personalities, and boiler room blowhards… but enough about Jim Cramer. The market is comprised of all of this confusing and contradictory information.

And it’s why we’re obsessed with the news flow and desperate to parse the purposefully opaque language of those with control over the money spigots.

But the central banks, while they are powerful actors who have real ability to move markets, are ultimately at the mercy of the market itself.

It used to be that Fed Chairmen acted but never spoke. When I was a youngling very few people even knew who the Fed Chairman was.

Then Alan Greenspan came and changed that dynamic forever. Now they do nothing but speak. Now they are financial celebrities. Every day another important speech or press conference is on the schedule to set the tone for the markets.

Over the past 40 years or so, we’ve gone from no verbal intervention from the central banks to constant intervention. Central bank communications strategies prove the conclusions of Mises and Hayek from a couple of generations earlier:

Interventions into the free market always necessitate, later, an even greater intervention due to the misallocation of capital from its natural state. This natural state exists because of the needs and wants of the people who make up that system.

It’s reflected in the price of money known as interest rates. Rates are naturally different for different demands for money. Riskier and longer time to maturity investments require greater sacrifice from lenders requiring higher rates and vice versa.

I know y’all know this stuff, but it’s important to review the basics every now and then.

When central banks muck with interest rates away from that natural rate of interest they stimulate one area of investment at the expense of another. There is a finite pool of real savings that can be deployed from previously profitable human action.

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

Lowering the cost of money below the natural rate consumes that pool faster than it can be replenished.

Eventually the pool is exhausted and some of the projects it financed are revealed to be uneconomic and must be liquidated. The boom created by cheap money begets the bust that inevitably occurs.

At that point the central banks are expected to come in and do something to save these projects because the societal cost of allowing the bust is far worse than maintaining the boom.

At least that’s he Hobson’s Choice they always present to us.

When your money is based on debt it means issuing more debt to pay for the past round of debt-based financing.

Well, what happens when we can’t lever it all up anymore?

What happens at the limit of debt issuance , when the amount of profit the economy generates is equal to the amount of money needed to service the issued debt?

Are we there now? Or did we pass that event horizon in 2008 with the fall of Lehman Bros.? It’s a good question but it’s not relevant except in the severity of the crisis that is staring us in the face.

Rates began rising across the long end of the U.S. yield curve months ago. It started back in August if anyone was watching carefully.