Major Banks Sued For ISDAfix Rigging, Settle Case For $324M

 | May 04, 2016 03:30AM ET

Legal tussles seem never ending for big banks. Recently, seven major banks settled a private U.S. lawsuit in Manhattan federal court for a penalty amount of around $324 million, according to Reuters. The banks in question were accused for manipulation of ISDAfix rates, a benchmark used to appraise interest rate derivatives, commercial real estate mortgages and structured debt securities.

The banks – Bank of America Corp. (NYSE:C) , Barclays PLC (NYSE:C) , Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C) , Credit Suisse (SIX:CSGN) Group AG (NYSE:C) , Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE:DB) , JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and The Royal Bank of Scotland Group (LON:RBS) plc (NYSE:RBS) – are currently awaiting an approval from the court which will also settle the antitrust charges against the banks.

Notably, 14 banks were sued by numerous pension funds and municipalities for manipulating the ISDAfix benchmark for personal gains in the 2009–2012 period.

Meanwhile, under the latest settlement, JPMorgan will pay $52 million, Bank of America, Credit Suisse, RBS and Deutsche Bank will cough up $50 million each, while Citigroup will expend $42 million and Barclays will shell out $30 million.

The remaining banks under purview of investigation are BNP Paribas (PA:BNPP) SA, The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:GS) , HSBC Holdings Plc (NYSE:C) , Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) , Nomura Holdings Inc. (NYSE:NMR) , UBS Group AG (NYSE:UBS) , Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE:WFC) and U.K.-based ICAP (LON:IAP) Inc. – the former administrator for ISDAfix rates.

Per the allegations, the banks colluded to rig ISDAfix rates by rapidly executing trades just before the rate was supposed to be determined and delaying the processing of trades until it was fixed. This allowed the banks to manipulate the payments made to investors on derivative trades. Such action adversely impacted trillions of dollars of financial instruments tied to ISDAfix rates.

Previously, in Mar 2016, the attempts of the banks to steer clear of investors suffered a major setback after a federal judge in Manhattan rejected their bid to discard the abovementioned private lawsuit.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman permitted investors led by several pension funds and municipalities to pursue antitrust and breach-of-contract claims over ISDAfix rigging against most defendants. The Alaska Electrical Pension Fund and other investors raised “plausible allegations that a conspiracy among the defendants existed,” Furman stated.

Last year, Barclays agreed to pay a penalty of £74.2 million ($115 million) to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to settle ISDAfix manipulation charges.

Notably, several major banks have been charged for manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Notably, LIBOR is an important benchmark that financial institutions use to set interest rates in trillions of dollars worth of loans and investments.

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

Manipulation of benchmark interest rates by major financial institutions have triggered thorough investigations by regulatory bodies across Europe, Asia and America and claimed billions of dollars as settlements and fines. We look forward to the gradual resolution of such matters which will put long-drawn investigations to rest and bring reprieve to the banks. However, it is likely to deal a huge blow to their financials.

Meanwhile, regulatory authorities are thoroughly investigating issues related to the increasing occurrence of foreign exchange rate fixing and are determined to propose a landmark judgment to terminate such practices and bring justice to the wronged.

Zacks Investment Research

Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.

Sign out
Are you sure you want to sign out?
NoYes
CancelYes
Saving Changes