Is The USA Paying People Not To Work?
Econintersect LLC | Jan 25, 2015 05:39AM ET
Social safety nets are government or non-government (NGO) social programs to assist those in society who cannot work (or cannot work to full capacity). Many worry that such programs are incentives for people not to work IF they can get covered by a social safety net.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Follow up:
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Americans generally view social programs as anti-capitalistic (and try to limit applicability) - and view Europe, Canada and Australia as more socialistic. Using this logic, one would think that a higher percentage of Americans would need to work (as American's are not savers and see themselves as capitalistic) than other advanced economies.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
In some cases, a higher proportion of Americans work than other advanced economies. But it is not generally true.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Note on above chart: Employment to population ratio is the proportion of a country's population that is employed. Ages 15 and older are generally considered the working-age population. International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
What is true is that American's generally spend less on social safety nets than other advanced economies.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Total public social expenditure as a percentage of GDP
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
What we can also say is true is that there seems to be no direct correlation between social safety net spending and employment (Italy and France might be exceptions if one were cherry picking high social safety net spending and low employment). In general, most advanced economies spend more on social safety nets and have similar employment levels.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Basically this post is sharing information. There is difficulty when one tries to compare data between countries as data gathering is different and equalizing the results involve a certain "rough justice". It is just hard to get over the feeling that some would take advantage the option of being paid in lieu of working.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
But my real thoughts this week are around my theme for 2015 -Hello 2015! What Do You Have In Store for Us? In that post, I worried about currency wars effecting the business cycle. Currency wars are attempts by central banks to change the relative value of their currency using artificial means. There are two problems for the globalized business world:
Get The News You Want
- Although change is good - unanticipated change is disruptive in the short term - and always leads to dislocation and stunting of cycle growth while resources are reallocated. The larger the change, the greater the disruption;
- Central Bankers are engaging in long term actions. While short term actions can soften the effects of cycles - long term actions create unintended imbalances which eventually must correct. This past week, Switzerland bailed out of their artificial currency peg. The vaporization of assets could be heard around the world.
Get The News You Want
If the Swiss footprint is relatively small in size - it is not small in reach - touching most parts of Europe (especially Swiss denominated debt). Contagion is the problem here as it will not take much to take southern Europe over the edge.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
The heat is rising. and I no longer would bet against a currency war spillover into the USA business cycle. Could this be the straw that breaks the back of the US stock market advance?
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Other Economic News this Week:
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
The Econintersect Economic Index for January 2015 is showing our index is midrange in a tight growth range for almost a year. Although there are no warning flags in the data which is used to compile our forecast, there also is no signs that the rate of economic growth will improve. Additionally there are no warning signs in other leading indices that the economy is stalling - EXCEPT ECRI's Weekly Leading Index which is slightly below the zero growth line. There have been some soft data points which caused our index to decline this month - but as the individual rolling averages are not declining, we must assume it is simply a bad data month.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
The ECRI WLI growth index value crossed slightly into negative territory which implies the economy will not have grown six months from today.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
The market was expecting the weekly initial unemployment claims at 289,000 to 305,000 (consensus 300,000) vs the 307,000 reported. The more important (because of the volatility in the weekly reported claims and seasonality errors in adjusting the data) 4 week moving average moved from 300,000 (reported last week as 298,000) to 306,500. The rolling averages had been equal or under 300,000 for the previous 18 weeks.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims - 4 Week Average - Seasonally Adjusted - 2011 (red line), 2012 (green line), 2013 (blue line), 2014 (orange line), 2015 (violet line)
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Bankruptcies this Week: Wet Seal, Hipcricket
Get The News You Want
Click here to view the scorecard table below with active hyperlinks
h2 /h2 h2 Weekly Economic Release Scorecard:/h2
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.