Is The 60/40 Stock/Bond Portfolio Now 100/0 In Favor Of Stocks?

 | Dec 02, 2020 04:14AM ET

That’s been the subject of several financial headlines lately. The authors are suggesting that the traditional mix of 60% large-cap stocks and 40% safe bonds won’t generate enough money for us to retire on unless we’ve got a cool $10 million or so. And, they’ve got a point, with the S&P paying less than 2% and US Treasuries yielding under 1%.

But even a 100/0 portfolio won’t help you too much. Put it all in the popular SPY ETF, and we’re still under 2%! Plus, this “heart attack kid” can fluctuate by 1% or even 2% per day. Too much volatility, not enough income.

But, rather than “pull the plug” on the 40% of bonds contained in a traditional 60/40 retirement portfolio, we contrarian-minded income seekers can simply rearrange the holdings to give us a mix that is:

  • 53% stocks (and equity funds),
  • 47% bonds (and fixed-income funds), with a
  • 7.2% average dividend yield.

If this looks familiar, it’s because this is the current configuration of our Contrarian Income Report portfolio. Our CIR portfolio is split up into four buckets:

  • Fed-Fueled Dividends yielding 6.5% (with serious near-term upside),
  • Cash Cow Dividends paying 6.9% (multi-year stock holdings),
  • “Go Anywhere” Bond Funds dishing 8.9% (multi-year bond positions), and
  • Secure, Boring Bonds dealing 6.1% (to buy and hold almost forever).