Is IBM A Value Trap?

 | Aug 15, 2017 05:53PM ET

On its face,
The term that is being thrown around with increasing frequency is value trap. A value trap refers to a stock that has fallen out of favor and looks cheap because it trades at a low valuation but ultimately fails to recover. Value traps are often shares that have performed very well in the past, and then after an extended period of price weakness appear to be cheap.

IBM is an obvious candidate to be labeled a value trap. But is it? And, what are the signs investors should look for to confirm that it either is or isn’t a value trap?

Warren Buffet recently sold a third of his IBM stake, and many investors have pointed to this as proof that the company cannot justify its current valuation.

Convincing arguments can be made for and against IBM.The Bullish Argument

The company is in the process of reinventing itself, something it has done repeatedly over its 106-year history. The company has always moved toward higher value services and is doing so once again. They are divesting all of the least profitable legacy businesses, and investing in the cloud and AI businesses.

While the cloud and cognitive computing businesses are very competitive, IBM has a very strong presence in the enterprise services space, something its competitors lack. The company should be able to leverage its current client base to grow these segments faster than its competitors can.

Warren Buffet sold part of his IBM stake because he can’t quantify the risk going forward and he is a risk averse investor. That doesn’t mean the company won’t return to the levels of profitability it has enjoyed in the past.
A blue-chip stock trading at a P/E multiple of 10.2x and a dividend yield of 4% certainly looks like a good buy.

The P/E and forward P/E ratios are both low relative to IBM’s peers: Hewlett Packard Enterprise (NYSE:HPE) , HP Inc (NYSE:HPQ) , Apple (NasdaqGS:NASDAQ:AAPL), Accenture plc (NYSE:NYSE:ACN) and Microsoft (NasdaqGS:NASDAQ:MSFT). However, it is important to note that these businesses all have different operating models so a comparison like this is somewhat limited.