China Takes Over From Greece

 | Aug 12, 2015 06:20AM ET

China takes over from Greece A few weeks ago it was Greece, Greece, Greece every day. Yesterday, the country effectively secured an agreement with representatives of its international creditors (at least at the technical level if not yet at the political level). Last month that would have dominated the news, but yesterday it warranted barely a glance – now it’s China, China, China. As well it should be, given the difference in the importance of the countries for the global economy.

• With the Chinese economy slowing and the stock market faltering, investors had been hoping for a Chinese fiscal stimulus package or other measures to support the domestic economy that would also be a spur for global growth. Instead, the country devalued its currency, a move that simply tries to reallocate growth from elsewhere to itself. More exports for China maybe; probably less imports and hence less growth elsewhere.

• Furthermore, yesterday is not likely to be the end of the matter. While the initial depreciation of the currency was less than 2% and was accompanied by a statement saying that this was a “one-off depreciation,” the currency’s officially determined reference rate was down another 1.6% today and apparently the PBOC had to intervene in the market to prevent it from falling further. Furthermore, the PBOC made clear yesterday that the change was a first step towards a more market-determined exchange rate. Given the recent capital outflows, that’s likely to mean an even weaker CNY in the future, as Chinese investors now see downside risk in their currency. As a result, the “currency war” started almost immediately as Vietnam also widened the trading band on its currency yesterday, citing the CNY devaluation as the reason.

• Markets quickly grasped the implications: WTI was down 4.1% and copper down 3.3%. The EUR 5yr breakeven inflation rate fell 5 bps, as did the US 5yr/5yr inflation swap and yield curves flattened. Fed funds rate expectations plunged 7 or 8 bps as the market tried to assess how the Chinese move would affect central banks elsewhere. Fed Chair Janet Yellen has previously argued that the timing of the first rate hike is less important than how high the rate ends up at – the terminal rate. That’s probably what the Chinese move may affect. The FOMC’s reasoning on why they want to move rates from zero to something is one thing, their thinking for what the appropriate rate for the “new normal” conditions is another. China doesn’t affect the former, but it does affect the latter.