How Much Political Risk Can The Markets Tolerate?

 | Feb 09, 2017 08:02AM ET

Bull markets have been known to climb a wall of worry. But when does a rising supply of unease become too much to handle?

The answer may be forthcoming as investors digest an expanding front of worrisome developments in the political realm. Let’s start with the US, where President Trump has delivered a daily barrage of politically contentious tweets, statements, and executive orders since his inauguration last month. From “demoralizing” attacks on the judiciary, America’s boisterous new leader has been ripping up the script left and right. In the wake of this tsunami of words and ideas investors are left to wonder what it all means for the US economy and the state of geopolitical affairs.

Ian Bremmer, who heads up the Eurasia Group, a consultancy, describes the policy changes unfolding under the Trump administration as the most significant for political risk in 2017 since World War II.

It’s a geopolitical recession; it’s the beginning of a long cycle. We are now at the end of the Pax Americana. For the last decades, if you’re thinking about the global marketplace, globalization and Americanization have been the same thing. Globalization is continuing. Americanization is not. We’re making it very clear that we no longer want to be the cheerleader of global values or the architect of global trade or the world’s sheriff.

Regardless of whether you support the change or not, there will be repercussions. Trump supporters argue that when the dust clear the US will be in a stronger position economically and geopolitically because of the policy changes underway. Skeptics take the opposite view.

Mr. Market, one can argue, remains optimistic. The S&P 500 Index, after surging in the wake of Trump’s election victory in November, continues to hold on to the gains and remains close to an all-time high. One might wonder why equities remain elevated amid so much turmoil and uncertainty that’s directly linked to the White House? The potential for stronger economic growth seems to be the main answer, perhaps the only answer.