Brian Gilmartin | Nov 23, 2015 11:23PM ET
The Healthcare sector has struggled since the August ’15, China-induced, beat-down on the major equity indices, which is exactly what typically happens when the market has a decent correction.
Biotech stocks, the Healthcare sector, and Apple (O:AAPL) have been leadership groups (with a 4% market cap weighting and a 6% earnings weight within the S&P 500, we can call Apple a “group”), although all three groups have begun to lag since the October ’15 bounce. Apple is still shy of its 200-day moving average even though the S&P 500 as an index traded back above its 200-day moving average this week. (Long Apple)
The attached chart of the iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology ETF (O:IBB) shows that it too is struggling below its 200-week moving average.
The first sentence of this post alludes to the fashion in which the stock market creates the next set of winners and losers within the indices: while leadership groups can certainly exit a correction and continue to lead as Technology and Financials did in the late 1990s, usually market corrections and the subsequent rally typically lead to a different configuration of winners and losers, and the August, ’15, “China Syndrome” correction was no exception, as Biotech and Apple now lag (if only slightly so far) the October – November bounce.
h3 Healthcare sector by the numbers: /h3
Both Thomson and Factset are projecting lower EPS and revenue growth for the Healthcare sector for the next 5 quarters.
However here is the catch: if we look at the Healthcare sector’s expected growth vs actual growth, the last 4 quarters:
The point to the above is that Healthcare has put up some solid earnings and revenue growth, even when expectations are subdued, so the forward estimates can be discounted to some extent.
Conclusion: About the time that the likely Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton came out and discussed price controls on some biotech drugs (during the late August ’15-early October ’15 10% correction for the S&P 500) Meg Terrell, CNBC’s biotech reporter, who in my my opinion has been a solid add to the CNBC coverage team, noted a study she obtained from a hedge fund that in Presidential election years, the Healthcare sector tends to under-perform the broader market, (assume S&P 500) pretty consistently over time.
That is the catch to the above analysis: even if Healthcare as a sector continues to grow at “above S&P 500 growth rates,” will the sector P/E compress in a Presidential election year, where the likely Democratic Party nominee should remain ahead in the popular polls?
Let’s face it: the Healthcare sector can become a whipping boy (girl?) in an election year, as candidates play to the populist themes.
Last week’s pre-announcement by United HealthCare (N:UNH) that they may be reconsidering some of the ACA exchange initiatives could be a harbinger for slowing growth in early 2016.
Right now, from a “relative performance perspective” with the historical performance of the sector in election years, UNH’s announcement last week, and even Pfizer’s (N:PFE) merger announcement with Allergan (N:AGN) yesterday morning, which, given the dilution of Pfizer’s stock should kill any upside for the shares over the next 12 months,
Biotech as a sub-sector of Healthcare is roughly 7% of total Healthcare revenue and 23% of total sector earnings growth.
There are some cracks starting to appear in the Healthcare sector, i.e. Biogen (O:BIIB) this Spring of 2015, UNH’s disappointment last week, and the Valeant (N:VRX) saga which we failed to mention.
Normally, when we write a sector analysis like this, I like to leave readers with a strong opinion one way or the other as to what we are thinking regarding the sector. A strong opinion is lacking right now, but given the “seasonal” trade, the potential for P/E compression, and the potential for slower growth, clients will remain underweight the sector for now. Clients' largest Healthcare holding as of today is Pfizer, which is down 5% in the last 5 trading days and 7.5% in the last month on the Allergan merger, and thanks to the dilution, will probably leave the stock as dead money over the next 12 months.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.