Gold Stocks Break Down Below 2017 And 2018 Lows

On the long-term chart you can see why we were very skeptical toward the possible long-term bearish implications of the previous breakdown below the mentioned declining support line. It’s because a much more important support was reached , and it held. Precisely, there was only a tiny breakdown below the combination of support levels and it was invalidated immediately.

The key mentioned support levels that held are the 2009 and 2010 tops along with 2 major retracements based on major extremes (marked with red and black on the above chart). The above combination is much stronger than the previously discussed declining line. The reason is that the mid-2015 and 2016 lows are less prominent than the 2009 and 2010 tops and the line based on the former is not strengthened by key Fibonacci retracements, while the latter is.

Consequently, the invalidation of breakdowns below the key, long-term support levels is far more important than the declining shorter-term line.

The above has been the reason for one to expect the move back above the declining resistance line. Yesterday’s session proved that the above expectation was correct. Moreover, thanks to the simultaneous breakout above the declining short-term resistance lines, the odds are that rallies will follow.

Also, the above chart explains the title of this section. The mentioned declining resistance line based on the 2015 and 2016 lows, along with the rising dashed line based on the 2015 and 2017 tops create an expanding triangle pattern that is sometimes referred to as a megaphone pattern.

Just as the USD Index moved close to its previous highs, the price of gold moved to its previous lows. It also broke below the rising support line based on the previous short-term lows. Gold is at its 38.2% Fibonacci retracement, which is an important short-term support level. The previous breakdown below it was invalidated and followed by an upswing, so gold could still move temporarily higher.

Still, if silver is to outperform gold and the former is to move close to its recent short-term high, then gold should not move as high. The volume that accompanied Monday’s move higher was rather low, which suggests that the strength of the bulls is limited. It fits the scenario in which gold moves higher for a few days (to gold’s cyclical turning point which is marked with a vertical line) or a week and a few days and then starts a big slide.

Again, there are multiple long-term factors in play that favor lower gold prices and they could trigger a decline regardless of the short-term signals – the surprises can and are likely to be to the downside.

Consequently, the medium-term outlook remains bearish, but just as we are skeptical regarding the USD’s breakout, we are still skeptical regarding gold’s short-term breakdown below the rising support line. Yes, it’s bearish, but we will not be surprised by another attempt to move higher before the big slide starts.

The latter is certainly possible in light of silver’s self-similar pattern.

Silver seems to be repeating its performance from the second half of the previous year.

The January 2018 – February 2018 decline is a quicker version of the September – October 2017 downswing. The subsequent corrections are very similar – in both cases, silver moved a bit above the 50% Fibonacci retracement, but not above the 61.8% one. The following decline erased most of the correction. Then, back and forth trading started where intraday highs were not as high as the highest intraday price of the preceding corrective upswing. The intraday lows of subsequent sessions were increasing.

The initial corrective upswing also took silver above both moving averages: the 20- and 50-day one. Then, the back and forth trading took place around the red moving average, but below the blue one. That’s what happened on Monday – silver moved a bit above the red MA, but not above the blue one.

Having established the self-similarity, let’s see how we can use it.

We can use to determine the next silver turning point and the trading opportunity. In this particular case, we see that the final top and the superb opportunity to go short presented itself in mid-November, when silver rallied above the declining resistance line based on the previous intraday highs and visibly above the blue (50-day) moving average.

It took a bit more time for silver to rally in November 2017 than it did for it to decline in October, so in this case, we can expect silver to take a bit more time to rally than it did to decline in the second half of February.

Combining the above price and time analogies, we get the target that we marked with a red ellipse on the above chart. The target is quite wide and there are good reasons for it. Back in November, silver topped below the previous top, but silver is known to get ahead of itself during these intraday outperformance cases, so we’re not ruling out a scenario in which it “breaks out” above the mid-February top only to invalidate the “breakout” shortly thereafter.

As far as time is concerned, please recall that in Monday's free analysis we thoroughly discussed the apex triangle reversal technique for gold and it pointed to two scenarios: one in which the top is already in and a second one in which the top is going to be in in about two weeks (a bit less, counting from today). Moreover, gold’s cyclical turning point is tomorrow, so it could be the case that it triggers silver’s rally and the subsequent reversal. Overall, it’s rather unclear when precisely the silver reversal will take place, but we know more or less when to expect it and we know what signs to look for as a confirmation (silver’s breakouts above the declining, short-term resistance line and the 50-day moving average).

Speaking of apex-triangle-based reversals, please note that the above chart shows yet another confirmation of this technique’s usefulness. The triangle based on the October and November 2017 lows (solid line) and the September and November 2017 tops (dashed line) had their apexes exactly at the time when one would want to reverse their short positions or close them. Perhaps applying this technique to the upcoming decline will serve as a way to detect a short-term reversal as well.

During yesterday’s trading, silver moved a bit below the rising short-term support line, but closed right at it, without a meaningful breakdown. The volume that accompanied it was significant, which is bearish, but please note that since the back-and-forth movement in silver still continues and the self-similar pattern remains in place, we should still take into account the possibility of a quick upswing right before the slide.

Gold miners declined substantially yesterday and closed at new 2018 lows, which means that they also broke below the previous 2017 lows. There was no new intraday low, but the closing prices are more important with regard to breakdowns below important price levels.

More importantly, this time, the breakdown was not triggered by a huge and volatile decline in main stock indices. The S&P Index is above the 50% Fibonacci retracement based on the decline, so it’s definitely not moving to new lows. Therefore, the gold stocks’ performance represents true weakness of the PM sector.

By the way, the S&P 500 Index just invalidated the breakout above the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level based on the daily closing prices, so we might (!) see another slide lower.

Moving back to mining stocks, the breakdown below the previous 2017 and 2018 lows is not yet confirmed as that was just one daily close, but in light of the long-term breakdowns in the gold stocks to gold and gold stocks to S&P ratios, it seems that bearish outlook is definitely justified.

But, does the above rule out the possibility of seeing another move higher before the big slide in the miners begins? It’s definitely less likely than it was before yesterday’s session, but it’s still possible.

As a reminder, during the previous volatile declines, gold and silver mining stocks quite often corrected twice before another big wave down started. Is this time any different? It could be the case based on the mentioned breakdowns in the ratios, but it’s not certain.

While we’re at it, we would like to provide you with a reply to a question that we received about using the RSI to time the upcoming bottom in the GDX (NYSE:GDX). Our price targets may (and it even seems likely) correspond to the RSI below 30, so the question is if the targets are not too low. Here’s our take.

It seems that we have entered the stage in the precious metals market where aggressive downside targets for mining stocks are justified. The reasons are the key breakdowns in the HUI to gold and the HUI to S&P ratios that you saw in Monday’s alert. Based on them we should expect a lot of negativity from mining stocks in the coming weeks and months. The RSI around (!) 30 is a bullish factor, but please keep in mind that targets based on prices are more precise than those that are based on the RSI.

For instance, about a year ago, on March 2nd, the RSI for GDX was at about 32 when GDX closed at 21.75. It was relatively close to the bottom, but the true bottom formed only once RSI moved below 30 in the following days. On March 9, the closing price was 20.97 - about 4% lower. In August 2016, the RSI-around-32 bottom was $26.68, and the real bottom was several days later with RSI below 30 and GDX at $25.21 (closing price). About 6% lower.

The key thing, however, is what happened during the 2013 decline - as that’s what we think is likely to be seen once again. In late January 2013, the RSI around 30 served as a good buy signal but only for the immediate future. In fact, for many investors, it would have been better to stay short at that time. Most subsequent bottoms were formed with the RSI at or below 25 and exiting positions with the RSI at 30 would have been very premature.

Concluding, the RSI may not be as effective in the next several months as it was in the past 2 years or so. Even if it is, bottoms may form with the indicator a bit below 30, instead of being a bit above it. Consequently, it seems better to look at the price levels based on support lines, retracements and other techniques than to put huge weight to the RSI’s indication. It’s still going to be important, but not to the extent it used to.

Some signs, like breakouts and breakdowns are clearly visible, but some are known only to those who have been in the market for a long time and have taken the time to analyze it thoroughly. One of the latter sings comes from the palladium market.

The less-popular white metal provides us with important short- and medium-term signals, but only if one knows where to look. The volume that accompanies the weekly upswing is the thing that can help us determine what kind of move we should expect. The size of the palladium market is limited and it’s not as popular as gold or silver, so sudden increases in the buying activity may imply big upswings in interest among individual investors (this market may be too small for many institutions).

Where do people want to “buy buy buy!”? At the tops. Therefore, the big increase in the volume may indicate a surge in the sentiment, which in turn indicates a local top. The above worked in 7 out of 9 recent cases, so it seems that the above kind of link does indeed exist. Consequently, the implications of the most recent weekly upswing are bearish and the above strengthens the already bearish case.

Summing up, the top in gold, silver and mining stocks is probably in, but there’s still a possibility that the PMs’ decline will be delayed by a few days or a week and a few days. Mining stocks and – in particular – silver will be the assets to look at for necessary confirmations before making adjustments to the current trading position. However, based on the information that we have today, it seems that in both cases the outlook for the following months will remain bearish.

Written By: Sunshine Profits