Gold Juniors’ Strong Financials

 | Aug 23, 2015 03:49AM ET

The smaller gold miners and explorers have suffered catastrophic stock-price losses in recent years. These extreme declines have led investors and speculators to assume that much of this sector won’t survive lower prevailing gold prices. But nothing could be farther from the truth. The hated and left-for-dead junior-gold sector is not only very strong financially today, but could still thrive at much lower gold prices.

With many hundreds of junior gold stocks trading around the world, this sector isn’t easy to measure. They range from smaller producers with fantastic operating mines, to explorers doggedly advancing their projects in these dark times, to countless garbage shell companies that will never do anything beyond fleecing the unwary. The proliferation of junior golds is incredible, making it difficult to wade through the morass.

For many years contrarian analysts including me struggled with attempts to track the performance of junior golds as a sector. Many proprietary indexes were constructed, but they never caught on. Finally in November 2009, a major ETF player solved this problem. That’s when Van Eck Global launched the Junior Gold Miners ETF, which trades as GDXJ. It has become the metric of choice for measuring this sector.

And per GDXJ, the carnage in junior golds has been astounding. It peaked back in April 2011 way up near $152 on a split-adjusted basis. But soon gold crested so traders started fleeing its miners and explorers. GDXJ’s bottom fell out. Things got so bad that GDXJ’s custodians felt compelled to execute a 1-for-4 reverse split in July 2013. But with gold remaining weak since, the heavy junior-gold selling continued.

By earlier this month after that extreme gold shorting attack spawned a gold-stock panic, GDXJ plunged to an all-time split-adjusted low around $18. Its total loss over 4.3 years was a devastating 87.8%! There is little doubt junior golds were the worst-performing sector in all the stock markets, a terrible distinction. Such mind-boggling wealth destruction led most investors and speculators to exit this cursed sector forever.

Like everyone who sells low after a long price decline, these traders attempted to rationalize their fleeing decision as prudent and wise. There was a growing consensus that most of the smaller gold miners and explorers were doomed. Gold prices were too low to fuel profitable operations for the miners, and the explorers didn’t have a prayer of raising essential capital in these equity markets. The juniors had no hope.

But as always when literally everyone is convinced any sector will move in one direction forever, this sentiment was dead wrong. While it’s been an exceedingly-challenging couple of years for the junior gold companies, they’ve ridden out this hellstorm surprisingly well. You certainly wouldn’t know it from their epically-low stock prices, but their operational performance and financials today are actually quite strong!

Get The News You Want
Read market moving news with a personalized feed of stocks you care about.
Get The App

This heretical idea is so counter to popular opinion that few are even willing to consider it. Anyone that is foolish enough to even assert that junior golds have strong financials today will be laughed off of the podium. But that’s exactly what the cold, hard data from the junior golds’ brand-new Q2 financial results proves. And the definitive list of elite junior gold stocks is found in the holdings of that GDXJ junior-gold ETF.

This week GDXJ’s custodians held 61 “gold stocks” in this ETF’s portfolio. The quotation marks are because this “Junior Gold Miners ETF” oddly includes silver miners as well. It also has exploration-stage companies, royalty companies, and streaming companies, all of which aren’t technically gold miners. But these other types of ventures are certainly within the wheelhouses of junior-gold investors and speculators.

Reading through quarterly reports is tedious and time-consuming, and I didn’t have enough time or patience this week to read through all 61 of GDXJ’s component companies’ results. So I chose the 34 largest GDXJ components, the stocks with the top weightings, to analyze their Q2 results. Why 34? That’s how many fit in these tables below. Together they account for over 5/6ths of the entire weight of GDXJ.

This deep-research project actually started last week, when I did the same for the major gold miners of the GDX Gold Miners ETF. Also strangely, some of GDX’s components are also included in GDXJ. If I was constructing these underlying indexes, I certainly wouldn’t allow overlap. My thesis last week was that the popular notion that the gold-mining industry’s costs today are around $1200 per ounce is totally false.

The bears spent last month using this fallacy to argue that selling gold stocks at extreme lows was totally rational, since these companies couldn’t survive for long under $1200. But the actual Q2 results from the top 34 GDX components proved that this industry’s average all-in sustaining costs were just $895 per ounce. As long as gold is above those far-lower levels, their operations continue to remain profitable.

Equally important, the major gold miners of GDX had an average cash cost in Q2 of just $635 per ounce! That means they could survive for a long time even if gold was to miraculously plunge far under $800 as some of the legions of bears still forecast. After that popular essay showing today’s gold prices and far lower are no threat to gold miners, I got a deluge of e-mails wondering about the juniors’ precarious position.

Theoretically the larger gold miners should be much stronger than the smaller ones. The big guys have multiple mines, with many having multiple orebodies with different cost structures from which to mine gold. Their diversified mine portfolios give them far more flexibility in weathering extreme gold-price anomalies than single-mine operations, which describes most junior miners. They should’ve looked worse.

So I was shocked this week to find that the junior gold miners were actually looking stronger than the majors in some ways! Their collective costs of mining gold are slightly lower than the majors’, in both cash and all-in-sustaining terms. Of the top 34 companies in GDXJ, the gold miners had average cash and all-in sustaining costs of $613 and $858 in the second quarter of 2015! They are actually thriving today.

These tables summarize the results from those 34 top-GDXJ-component quarterly reports. Not all data was provided by every company, as they trade around the world on different exchanges with different financial-reporting standards. Whenever I couldn’t find information for a company, I left that field blank. The explorers are evident as the companies with zero production in Q2, shown in the final column on the right.

Each company’s cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining cost per ounce, and AISC guidance for all of 2015 is noted. I also looked at balance-sheet strength in terms of cash on hand, cash’s percentage of the current market capitalization, cash provided by operations, and debt service. While the latter couldn’t fit on these tables, none of these companies had any problems easily making debt payments with operating cash flows.