Gold Analogue: Then And Now
Gary Christenson | Oct 29, 2015 10:47AM ET
Circa 1970s: Gold rallied from about $35 in 1970 to nearly $200 in December 1974, and then fell to about $100 in August 1976.
So what?
Examine the graph of average monthly gold prices Jan. 1970 – Sept. 1976. Compare it to the graph of gold prices from April 2002 – October 2015. Note that the second graph was prepared with the same number of data points, but the time scale was doubled – each point is a two month average price. Note the similarity in form. The first is scaled $0 to $200 and the second $0 to $2,000.
What We See
Gold prices increased by a factor of almost six from 1970 to 1974, and then fell by about 45%.
Gold prices increased by a factor of about six from April 2002 to August 2011, and then fell by about 45% from the peak.
Both the rally and correction in 2002 – 2015 took about twice as long as in the 1970s.
Subsequent to the 1976 bottom, gold prices increased by a factor of about eight in a massive bubble inspired by, among others, inflation worries, fear, and loss-of-confidence in government and central banks.
What does this prove? Well … it proves nothing. But it suggests a few observations.
Gold prices can be amazingly volatile, especially when fear increases and a majority of people lose confidence in debt based fiat currencies, central banks, and politicians.
If the analogue continues for several more years, we might see gold prices increase by a factor of five to ten into the $5,000 to $10,000 range in five to seven years (double the 3.5 year rally in the 1970s).
We should not expect this analogue to predict gold prices, but we should NOT discount the possibility of a similar pattern unfolding.
Why?
In the late 1970s the US had lost international prestige due to a weak President (Carter), massive inflation and excessive debt.
Today the US has lost considerable prestige in the Middle-East, Europe and Asia, has excessive debt, no capacity to balance the budget, and has twice elected a President who is …. (your choice of complaint).
Get The News You Want
The late 1970s inflation was partially a consequence of massive spending on the Vietnam War – which benefitted few besides military contractors and bankers.
Today the US has yet to experience and pay for the consequences of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, but unpleasant consequences will occur. Those wars primarily benefitted military contractors and bankers.
Central bankers and politicians lost considerable respect in the late 1970s.
Central bankers and politicians have lost considerable respect in the past several years.
Debt based fiat currency, backed by nothing but faith, hope, delusions, and taxing authority was deeply devalued in the late 1970s.
Debt based fiat currency, backed by nothing but faith, hope, delusions, and taxing authority will be deeply devalued in the coming years.
CONCLUSIONS
There are similarities between the late 1970s and present day. Gold rose substantially for 3.5 years in the late 1970s and increased in price by a factor of about eight. Something similar could (probably will) happen again.
NONSENSE: such as deficit spending, massive debt, excessive leverage, unindicted fraud, pervasive corruption, derivative contracts with minimal margin, hope and delusions, bond monetization, suppressed interest rates, levitated stock markets, forever wars, and so much more - encourages people to think:
People want to be prepared with the 4 G’s: God, gold, guns, and grub.
The politicians and central bankers created most of the problems so it is foolish to believe they will solve current problems. Expect more fiscal and monetary nonsense, devaluation of currencies, inflation, and higher gold and silver prices.
War pays extremely well – if you are a military contractor, banker, or politician – so expect more war. More war creates much more debt, inflation, and fiscal and monetary nonsense.
The US Congress has a low approval rating – for good reason.
Debt cannot grow to infinity nor can interest rates remain near zero forever.
The “silly season” when the US elects a new president is not a time to expect serious and intelligent discourse or change toward fiscal and monetary sanity.
Time to prepare may be quite short.
Paper dies, gold thrives.
Paper dies, silver thrives.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.