Urban Carmel | Nov 18, 2014 11:39PM ET
Every month, we review the latest BAML survey of global fund managers. Among the various ways of measuring investor sentiment, this is one of the better ones as the results reflect how managers are allocated in various asset classes. These managers oversee a combined $700b in assets.
Here's a brief recap of the past several months:
In July, fund manager equity allocations reached a bullish extreme. At +61% overweight, it was the second highest since the survey began in 2001, a clear risk to near-term equity performance (post ).
Now, the strong recovery in equity prices (to new bull market highs in the US and Japan) has pushed cash levels down a bit and equity allocations up to near their prior highs. That's especially true for US and Japan equity exposure.
Let's review the highlights from November.
Fund managers have reduced their cash levels to 4.7%. This is still relatively high on a historical basis but note that cash levels haven't been below 4.5% in the past year. We consider current levels to be neutral. Instances are very low, but over 5% represents bearish sentiment: this is where bottoms in equities have formed in the past.
Global equity exposure is now +46% overweight, a 12 percentage point increase since last month. Current allocations are at the same level as in June and September of this year, both of which preceded equity weakness. We consider current levels to be at the high end of neutral (over +50% is bearish).
As we have continually noted, what has been remarkable is how long managers have been highly overweight equities (virtually since the start of 2013). This is longer than any period during the 2003-07 bull market (yellow shading). In the past, after overexposure like that seen in the past 2 years, a washout low would be marked by an equity weighting under +15-20% (green shading). By that measure, equities are over owned.
The biggest surprise in September was that fund managers dropped their US equity exposure to just +1% overweight. Given how strongly the US has outperformed the rest of the world in the past several years, that exposure was surprisingly low. The US was under owned.
In November, US exposure jumped to a 15 month high of +25% overweight. Managers' allocations to the US are now 1.4 standard deviations above the long term mean. . This is where US outperformance has ceased in the past. BAML considers current levels to be contrarian short on a relative performance basis; we agree.
Managers now have their largest equity exposure in Japan. Allocations haven't been this high since April 2006. It looks extreme. BAML considers this to be a contrarian short.
Managers were -31% underweight iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (ARCA:EEM) in March. This was a strong contrarian buy. In the ensuing months, the region strongly outperformed. In August, allocations increased to +17% overweight, the highest in 17 months. As we noted then, the fat pitch had passed. Exposure is now back to neutral. This is where bottoms form, but, in the past, it has taken more than one month for a solid low to be put in.
Remarkably, although US bonds have outperformed SPX so far in 2014, fund managers are still -52% underweight. In July, exposure fell to their lowest in more than 6 months. It's not much higher now. Bonds continue to be the most hated asset class and this, in large part, explains why cash balances have not been lower that 4.5% in the past year. For comparison, managers were -38% underweight in May 2013 before the large fall in bond prices. There is room for bond exposure to rise further.
Globally, managers are not just overweight equity and underweight bonds, they are overweight the highest beta equity (technology, discretionary, banks) and underweight defensives (telecom, staples). However, utilities are now overweight. The largest underweight is energy. These are contrarian investments.
That is equally true in the US. Tech is the most favored sector, followed by pharma and banks. This has been the case for many months. Utilities, staples, telecoms (defensives) and energy remain very underweighted.
Since the September 19 high, utilities and staples, two of the least liked sectors, have strongly outperformed. Among cyclicals, only tech and industrials have outperformed. Energy has been the obvious loser.
You can see from the data that it should mostly be looked at from a contrarian perspective. Fund managers were overweight EEM more than any other market at the start of 2013, and it was the worst performer that year. In comparison, they were 20% underweight Japan in December 2012 and it was the best equity market in 2013.
Survey details are below.
Original post
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.