FOMC Word-Play Kicks Off Gold, Stock Correction
Gary Tanashian | Oct 29, 2015 02:51PM ET
h3 What They Did/h3“In determining whether it will be appropriate to raise the target range at its next meeting, the Committee will assess progress–both realized and expected–toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.”
What did the Fed do Wednesday? Why, it rolled over once again and held ZIRP. They also got mighty specific with some wording that freaked out precious metals players and put in a reversal, not only in the metals, but importantly, in their ratio. See Wednesday’s post on the Silver-Gold ratio’s status… What Thing Looks Like the Other . A reversal in silver vs. gold would put the sector on a correction and also issue a warning to other global markets.
So the Fed still has a few tricks up its sleeve. It is backed into a corner in which they are expected to normalize monetary policy because well, they are they Fed, they have perceived credibility (i.e. the confidence of the markets in what is largely a confidence game) and legions of conventional investors to whom they must appear reasonably normal.
h3 What It's Facing/h3Here is what it actually has, an abnormal distortion of its own creation in the markets; and if you ask me, an out-and-out disgrace on its hands. The horizontal red dotted line is post-2008 monetary policy. This while the S&P 500 grew a third hump of epic proportions.
Looking at yields in the 30yr-5yr year range (lower panel above), we see that the Treasury bond market is trying to turn that curve up (orange shaded area). The early stages of such upturns have broken the stock market on the last two cycles (red). Is this a picture of the ‘Bond Vigilantes’ taking over the show out on the curve, far enough away from the Fed influenced short end?
h3 Shorter-Term Spreads Still Under Control/h3The 10yr-2yr still looks completely under control and in the grips of unbending confidence in the Federal Reserve. Here are the nominal 10’s and 2’s, showing the shorter duration popping big with the dreaded wording in the FOMC release. The Fed really means it this time!… maybe. The alignment in bonds nearer the Fed-controlled Funds Rate continues to show that all is well, normal, in control and by the way, antagonistic to gold, which most definitely does not want to see short rates rising vs. long rates.
Get The News You Want
Complicating matters is an appreciating currency, which Fed members are actually fairly neurotic about. Here, courtesy of Bloomberg, is the graphical view of Fed members’ mentions of the US dollar at recent meetings. The chart broke out even before Wednesday’s meeting. Meanwhile, Mario Draghi thinks… ‘Bravo miei amici , bravo! Lavoro ben fatto.’
Of course, the implications of higher interest rates favor the banking sector as they disfavor gold. Gold after all is the ‘no one’s liability’ asset in a financial world stuffed to the gills with liabilities, including on Central Bank balance sheets and government coffers. Why on earth would it go up when everything is under control?
So it is very key for investors to decide whether or not the Fed has credibility. Given Draghi’s QE jawbone and monetary easing in China, the Fed sure is putting up a good front. Could the final brush stroke in the work of art created by Ben Bernanke with Operation Twist (which engineered and set in motion current bond market trends) and QE 3 (3rd time’s a charm?) be that this Fed can normalize policy with an orderly and extended rate hike regimen against a backdrop of easing global competitors and a rising domestic currency?
We can say ‘who needs the industrial sectors?’ if we want to be bubble headed dreamers, circa 2000. But even tech captains Apple (O:AAPL) and Alphabet (O:GOOGL), in their earnings beats, noted one real negative and that was the impact of currency exchange rates on overall results. How do you think Parker-Hannifin (N:PH), Rockwell International or General Electric (N:GE) are going to take a perpetually strong US dollar? So again, is the Fed posturing or going all in on the confidence game?
h3 Back On The Nuts & Bolts Of The Gold Sector/h3Focusing on gold, the Commitments of Traders data (courtesy of COTbase.com) were bearish (silver’s CoT was even more bearish). This was the warning that something was amiss (from a gold bug’s perspective) heading into the FOMC meeting. Large spec’s were near ‘full bull’, with Commercials going the other way. Odds are, that these conditions (cut off date 10/20) intensified into the FOMC release. Look at the little guy; he was feeling quite peppy and ripe for getting corrected.
Meanwhile here are the cold hard facts of some simple weekly charts.
Gold has been bouncing in a bear market.
Silver has been bouncing in a bear market.
HUI, for that matter, has been bouncing in a bear market after it ground around at the lower trend line amid the WSJ ‘pet rock’ contrary indicator in gold. It’s target is in the 150’s, preferably pending correction (mini or maxi) as the gold and silver CoT and attendant over-speculation get cleared.
Want to talk about a mean-spirited market? Bears that thought they saw a trend line breakdown (and oncoming final plunge) in using a ‘log’ scale chart (which scaled HUI to their view of a gold bug Armageddon) shorted HUI right into the bounce from 100 to 140. Wednesday’s pre-FOMC upside hysterics probably got many of them to cover, right before post-FOMC reversal.
That this the thing about modern-day policy making; everybody is trying to out think an entity (or speaking globally, entities) that has aggressively painted the macro. The MSM headlines rationalized Wednesday’s reversal in gold as speculative interests unwound trades in gold in light of the Fed’s stance (as implied by the wording). Regardless of the reasons that can be conjured now, the sector was in need of correction, whether it was to make its rally targets first or after said correction. My preference is ‘after’ for longer-term prospects of establishing a sound bottom for the sector.
If Wednesday’s reversal means what it typically has in the past, then upside will be delayed and by the time of the next highly anticipated (yes, I am being sarcastic) FOMC meeting in December, all the unhealthy inputs should be cleared out of the precious metals. The question of ‘will they or won’t they hike by a measly 1/4 or 1/2%?’ is I guess psychologically terrifying to market participants, but it is not functionally so when so many other ‘tools’ exist in policy toolboxes both in the US and globally. These tools (i.e. the various aspects of QE and quasi QE) are employed to promote inflation even as they enthrall conventional market participants under the spell of confidence that policy is sound and in control.
We now routinely expect policy, policy jawboning and media amplifying it all to be intimately intertwined with the markets. Nowhere is intact confidence in this regime so important than in the gold sector. If Wednesday’s signal in the silver-gold ratio is a good one, the precious metals are a ‘first mover’ to some ugly things coming in the broad stock market as well.
I am not saying that because ‘ooh, they are going to raise rates!!’ (history shows markets usually rise with a rate hike regime before ultimately crashing later on). I am saying that because of the T-Bill/Stock Market distortion and the message of the 30yr-5yr on the first chart in this post. I am also saying it because I know a rat when I smell one.
But the bottom line is that these are the markets we have, worked over by overly aggressive policy or not. So it is the lowly player’s job to understand what is at work here, have patience and make it work for you. It takes a lot of burned brain cells, but the macro is making sense. People who prepare for the eventual loss of confidence will be ready with both capital and sanity intact.
/h3
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.