ETHW Up 8% As Key Miner Claims Forked Chain Could 100x In 10 Years
The Tokenist | Sep 25, 2022 03:17AM ET
Is Ethereum too big to fail for the Merge leftovers to succeed?
Following the successful Merge, the old proof-of-work Ethereum still lives on. Thanks to Chandler Guo, who instigated EthereumPoW (ETHW), there are enough miners to keep Ethereum going, which was itself a hard fork of Ethereum Classic (ETC).
Guo claims that EthereumPoW could eventually equalize with Ethereum, going up as much as 100x in 10 years. But is there any data to support such a forecast?
h2 What Happened With The Merge And ETHW?/h2After dozens of upgrades and testnet runs over several years, the Bellatrix upgrade enabled the proof-of-work execution layer to communicate with the proof-of-stake consensus layer. When it was activated on September 6th, Beacon Chain validators could start generating Beacon Blocks as the new PoS Ethereum.
The Merge itself happened on September 15th as the Paris upgrade, docking Ethereum’s historic state with the new PoS layer. Visually represented, the Merge looked like this.
One day before the Merge, ETH price was hovering around ~$1,640, having dropped -20% since, to $1,296. In addition to losing -99.95% of its energy footprint by ditching miners, Ethereum’s staking efficiency drastically lowered ETH reward block issuance – its inflation. In other words, Ethereum 2.0 now has a lower inflation rate than Bitcoin, at +0.20% vs. +1.72% respectively.
As Beacon Chain became Ethereum’s new home, it is secured by over 432k validators, with 11.54% of its total ETH supply staked, worth ~$18.9 billion. Tellingly, this holds more value than the next largest Ethereum competitor – Cardano – has in total market capitalization. ETH staking rewards hover around ~4.1% annual percentage rate (APR).
However, because staked ETH is effectively securing the network, its withdrawal is yet to be enabled via the Shanghai upgrade. In the meantime, EIP-1559 base fee burning mechanic, which “was an attempt to create a bullish narrative at the expense of the miners.”
Get The News You Want
Guo compared token burning with the government imposing taxes to lower inflation. Of course, that’s because ETH miners were hit by it. Lastly, Guo noted that EthereumPoW’s goal is to be 100% autonomous and self-sustained within three years. How feasible is that goal?
After the Merge, at least Yahoo Finance that 90% of miners would go bankrupt. The problem is only miners with cheap electricity, at around $0.10 kW/h, could be profitable, in addition to having the latest GPU hardware like the GeForce RTX 3090.
On the Merge date, September 15th, ETHW got to ~$50, only to recede by -87%, to $6.61. That is over four times greater depreciation than ETH since the Merge.
Regarding user activity, during the last 24h, ETHW trading volume accounted for 0.4% of ETH volume during the same period. This is not surprising given Ethereum’s hundreds of dApps and multiple highly-trafficked layer 2 networks – Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. In contrast, EthereumPow has fewer than 10 dApps available.
This is also reflected by the massive difference in network hash rate power. EthereumPoW is holding at 6.17 TH/s , accounting for ~2,000 miners, while Ethereum had an ATH hash rate of 1,126.6 TH/s in May 2022. This means the EthereumPoW network has been left with merely 0.5% of its former hash power glory, which aligns with the massive daily trading volume difference.
h2 What About ETHW Upsides?/h2Based on data represented so far, it doesn’t take much to conclude that EthereumPoW is heading for an uphill battle, unlikely to succeed in leveling up with Ethereum in 10 years. When it all comes down to it, Ethereum has the largest number of developers involved, the first mover advantage, and the richest dApp ecosystem.
In addition to raw brain power, there is little evidence to suggest that people tend to bet on weak horses. This is particularly relevant in the blockchain space, with so many other dApp PoS alternatives to Ethereum itself – Avalanche, Solana, Cardano, Algorand, Cosmos, and Tron. And more are incoming. With that said, SEC Chair Gary Gensler did hint that post-Merge Ethereum could be considered a security.
Furthermore, a recent SEC lawsuit against Ian Balina revealed that the SEC is trying to take over jurisdiction over all Ethereum transactions based on US-based node concentration (45%). Without legislative intervention, it is feasible for the SEC to start treating Ethereum like a US securities exchange.
On the other hand, Ethereum lost its eco-based baggage by ditching miners. Institutional investors are more likely to invest in PoS blockchains due to the ESG framework imposed by Blackrock (NYSE:BLK). In the end, EthereumPoW miners will have few roads to tread now that the entire world is under a severe energy crunch.
Guo hopes ETHW miners will follow the same path as Bitcoin miners, tapping into wasted gas flares and abandoned hydro dams. However, it doesn’t seem likely that ETHW miners will match Bitcoin miners in terms of organization, funding, and communal drive.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.