Cyclical Rally Misleads Investors

 | Jun 04, 2020 07:55AM ET

In the last 50 trading days, the SPX has recorded a nearly 38% return which is the fastest 50 trading day return in the history of the index. A big reason for that is a rally in “cyclical” sectors—sectors of the stock market that are supposedly closely correlated with the real world economic cycle.

Such sectors are represented by a variety of funds: iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE:IWM) (small caps), Financial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLF) (financials), Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLY) (consumer discretionary), Energy Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLE) (energy), Industrial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLI) (industrials), Materials Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLB) (materials), iShares Transportation Average ETF (NYSE:IYT) (transports) and SPDR® S&P Homebuilders ETF (NYSE:XHB) (homebuilders). Over the past month, these cyclical ETFs have had the highest correlations to SPX. As those sectors have rallied so has the SPX.

This leads to a strange disconnect in which investors are bombarded with very bad economic data—millions of job losses every week—while simultaneously, stocks are rallying. What is going on?

The stock market takes its cues about the economy from cyclical stocks which not only form 40% of the index but also supposedly take their cue directly from the economy. This is where the disconnect comes from.

The recent performance of cyclical stocks doesn’t really reflect the economy. Why?

For one, cyclical stocks were excessively beat up during the selloff in March as investors crowded into secular sectors such as Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLK) (technology) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLV) (health care). Trailing 12 month returns of cyclical sectors lagged the  SPDR S&P 500 (NYSE:SPY) by as much as -25%, a historically large disconnect.

At some point a mean reversion was inevitable and in the last 2 months that is exactly what we have seen. Super cheap stocks became slightly less cheap. Cyclicals have narrowed their underperformance to only -20%.